The Politics of Need: Examining Governors’ Decisions to Oppose the “Obamacare” Medicaid Expansion
نویسندگان
چکیده
This article explains governors’ decisions to support or oppose Medicaid expansions offered under the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. We theorize that governors’ decisions to oppose the funding should depend on both political demands and the level of need in the state, though politics and need are often in tension. We find that governors’ partisanship and the composition of the legislature have substantively meaningful effects on governors’ decisions, but the level of need in the state exerts little effect on governors’ decisions. This suggests that for high profile, highly politicized issues such as the Affordable Care Act, political considerations outweigh the needs of citizens and state economic conditions in gubernatorial decision making.
منابع مشابه
Business Associations, Conservative Networks, and the Ongoing Republican War over Medicaid Expansion.
A major component of the Affordable Care Act involves the expansion of state Medicaid programs to cover the uninsured poor. In the wake of the 2012 Supreme Court decision upholding and modifying reform legislation, states can decide whether to expand Medicaid-and twenty states are still not proceeding as of August 2015. What explains state choices about participation in expansion, including gov...
متن کاملImplementing Obamacare in a red state--dispatch from North Carolina.
n engl j med 369;26 nejm.org december 26, 2013 2469 because of difficulties with the online marketplaces, and insurers are often receiving inaccurate information from the government about people who do manage to enroll. If such problems persist, they could deter relatively healthy persons from obtaining coverage and prevent the ACA from meeting its enrollment goals. Problems with the federal we...
متن کاملRed-State Medicaid Expansions - Achilles' Heel of ACA Repeal?
derided by its opponents as the monolithic “Obamacare,” the ACA is a multifaceted law with several distinct components — subsidized health insurance exchanges, individual and employer mandates, regulations of the individual insurance market including a defined package of essential benefits, and Medicaid expansion. While opposition to several of these elements remains nearly unanimous among cons...
متن کاملWhy states expand Medicaid: party, resources, and history.
After the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in March 2010 and the affirmation of its constitutionality by the Supreme Court in 2012, key decisions about the implementation of health care reform are now in the hands of states. But our understanding of these decisions is hampered by simplistic sortings of state directions into two or three simple, rigid categories. This ar...
متن کاملThe 2014 Governors’ Races and Health Care
The November 2014 midterm election was the first election since key coverage provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) were implemented, including the Medicaid expansion and creation of the health insurance exchanges. The pre-election variability in the states' implementation of these provisions coupled with the large number of states selecting their next governor made the election important ...
متن کامل