Carrots and Sticks: Prizes and Punishments in Contests
نویسندگان
چکیده
We study optimal contest design in situations where the designer can reward high performance agents with positive prizes and punish low performance agents with negative prizes. We link the optimal prize structure to the curvature of distribution of abilities in the population. In particular, we identify conditions under which, even if punishment is costly, punishing the bottom is more effective than rewarding the top in eliciting effort input . If punishment is costless, we study the optimal number of punishments in the contest. J C : D44, D82, J31, J41. K : Contests, All-pay auctions, Punishments, Order Statistics. ∗Moldovanu: Department of Economics, University of Bonn, Lennestr. 37, 53113 Bonn, Germany; e-mail: [email protected]. Sela: Department of Economics, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel; e-mail: [email protected]. Shi: Department of Economics, University of Toronto, 150 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3G7, Canada; e-mail: [email protected].
منابع مشابه
Sticking with Carrots and Sticks (Sticking Points Aside): A Response to Ventakapuram, Goldberg, and Forrow
متن کامل
How to Commit (If You Must): Commitment Contracts and the Dual-Self Model
This paper studies how dual-self (Fudenberg and Levine (2006)) decision-makers can use commitment technologies to combat temptation and implement long-run optimal actions. I consider two types of such technologies: carrot contracts (rewards for ‘good’ behavior financed by borrowing from future consumption) and stick contracts (self imposed fines for ‘bad’ behavior). Both types of contracts can ...
متن کاملReduced prizes and increased effort in contests
We study the general class of two-player public-policy contests and specify the asymmetry condition under which a more restrained government intervention that reduces the contestants’ prizes has the "perverse" effect of increasing their aggregate lobbying efforts.
متن کامل