Newer cars : Much safer
نویسندگان
چکیده
Secondary safety refers to mitigation of injury given that a crash occurs, as distinct from prevention of crashes. Evidence is presented that secondary safety of new cars has been improving substantially in recent years. (a) Single-car crashes, South Australia. The later the year of the car, the smaller is the probability of the driver being killed. (b) Car-car collisions, South Australia. Comparison of the severities of injury to the two drivers in the one collision is useful because speed of the impact is the same for the two drivers. The basic question is, which driver is killed? It is shown that it is much more likely to be the driver of the older car. (c) Car-car collisions, New South Wales. The finding was replicated with NSW data. In this case, the sample size was sufficient to include the mass ratio of the cars as a covariate. In each analysis, allowance was made for some covariates. Our interpretation of these results is that recent cars genuinely have appreciably better secondary safety than older ones. Possible reasons are discussed. Our results are from a time period starting several years ago and cars are about a decade old on average. Thus we cannot be sure an improvement is continuing in new cars now: the data is not yet available. The results are nevertheless relevant to the current and future road safety situation. As older cars are scrapped, the proportion of crashes that result in car occupant death will continue to fall for at least one decade into the future.
منابع مشابه
Myth: When it comes to drugs and devices, newer is always better.
There’s a well-known logical fallacy called an “appeal to novelty”. It captures a simple mistake we’ve probably all made: assuming that something is better just because it’s newer. For many consumer products in our society (cars, cell phones, computers, TVs), we tend to think that newer means higher performance, safety, and efficiency, and this notion also applies to healthcare.1 With many new ...
متن کاملAnyone for Higher Speed Limits? - Self-Interested and Adaptive Political Preferences
Swedish survey-evidence indicates that variables reflecting self-interest are important in explaining people’s preferred speed limits, and that political preferences adapt to technological development. Drivers of cars that are newer (and hence safer), bigger, and with better high-speed characteristics, prefer higher speed limits, as do those who believe they drive better than average, whereas e...
متن کاملIn an Era of Autonomous Vehicles, Rails are Obsolete
In few years autonomous vehicles will be nothing special in many countries. These vehicles will noticeably change the worldwide transport market. One of the noteworthy changes will be the leaving behind of rail systems, because of a number of essential rationales. The most significant rationales are: (a) Autonomous vehicles are much safer than trains and the chances for a car accident will be v...
متن کاملIn-use Fuel Economy and Emission Benefits of Hybrid- Electric School Buses in Iowa
It is much safer and more fuel-efficient to transport children to school in buses than in private vehicles. However, school buses still consume 8.2 million gallons of diesel fuel annually, and transportation costs can be a significant portion of school districts’ budgets. Children in dieselpowered school buses may also be exposed to higher levels of particulates and other pollutants than childr...
متن کاملRisk of injury to child passengers in sport utility vehicles.
OBJECTIVE The popularity of sport utility vehicles (SUVs) is growing, and they are increasingly being used as family vehicles. Because of the large size of SUVs, relative to passenger cars, parents may perceive that they are safer family vehicles. However, little is known about the safety of children in SUVs, compared with passenger cars. The objective of this study was to determine the relativ...
متن کامل