Potential advantages of interprofessional care in rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affects over 1 million people in the United States. Although the emergence of new medications has substantially improved treatment options and outcomes for patients with RA, the disease is still a major cause of morbidity and mortality. In addition, significant barriers to adherence characterize RA medication management. A reasonable approach to improving RA patient outcomes entails interprofessional, multidisciplinary models of care. Working with rheumatology specialists, RA multidisciplinary care teams may comprise case managers, pharmacists, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, physiatrists, orthopedists, or other health professionals. Experience and evidence have supported the value of interprofessional, coordinated care models for patients with various chronic diseases. However, potential drawbacks include the costs associated with implementation of such approaches, the extra time required for their administration, and the lack of incentives for clinicians to adopt collaborative care approaches. OBJECTIVES To summarize the arguments and evidence for interprofessional, multidisciplinary care programs in RA. SUMMARY Various multidisciplinary models of RA care have been described in the literature. Whereas the case for implementing such models is underscored by the chronic nature of the disease, by its comorbidities and complications, and by barriers to patient medication adherence, cost-effectiveness analyses to document benefits of coordinated interprofessional RA care are lacking. Most studies on interprofessional care in RA are relatively old and have been conducted outside of the United States. Nonetheless, the findings are still relevant and may shed light on potential avenues for the development of new models in this country.