Conversational Implicatures in Counterexample Retrieval: Working Memory and Crystallized Pragmatics
نویسندگان
چکیده
Conditional inference patterns are influenced by the availability of counterexamples. We show that aside of the semantic counterexamples that are stored in long-term memory, there is an additional pool of counterexamples that stem from conversational implicatures. Experiment 1 showed that for young adults the retrieval of pragmatic counterexamples requires working memory resources. Experiment 2 showed that for senior adults (aged 58 to 88) working memory resources were significantly lower. Nonetheless, seniors retrieved at least as many pragmatic counterexamples as young adults. As pragmatic counterexamples are key examples of cultural conventions, it is argued that senior adults compensate for limitations in working memory by relying on their acquired cultural expertise.
منابع مشابه
Embedded Implicatures and Optimality Theoretic Pragmatics
In a recent paper, Chierchia (2004) distinguishes global and local approaches to conversational implicatures and claims that several puzzles concerning implicatures in complex sentences can best be explained by a local approach. This conflicts with the Neo-Gricean view which is global in nature. I will argue that both approaches can coexist in optimality theoretic pragmatics where the proper pl...
متن کاملScalar Implicature and Local Pragmatics
The Gricean theory of conversational implicature has always been plagued by data suggesting that what would seem to be conversational inferences may occur within the scope of operators like believe, for example; which for bona fide implicatures should be an impossibility. Concentrating my attention on scalar implicatures, I argue that, for the most part, such observations can be accounted for w...
متن کاملConversational Implicatures and Communication Theory
According to standard pragmatics, we should account for conversational implicatures in terms of Grice’s (1975) maxims of conversation. NeoGriceans like Atlas & Levinson (1981) and Horn (1984) seek to reduce those maxims to the so-called Q and I-principles. In this paper I want to argue that (i) there are major problems for reducing Gricean pragmatics to these two principles, and (ii) that, in f...
متن کاملConversational Implicatures
According to standard pragmatics, we should account for conversational implicatures in terms of Grice's (1975) maxims of conversation. Neo-Griceans like Atlas & Levinson (1981) and Horn (1984) seek to reduce those maxims to the so-called Q and I-principles. In this paper I want to argue that (i) there are major problems for reducing Gricean pragmatics to these two principles, and (ii) that, in ...
متن کاملRelevance Implicatures
According to standard pragmatics, we should account for conversational implicatures in terms of Grice’s (1967) maxims of conversation. Neo-Griceans like Atlas & Levinson (1981) and Horn (1984) seek to reduce those maxims to the so-called Q and I-principles. In this paper I want to argue that (i) there are major problems for reducing Gricean pragmatics to these two principles, and (ii) in fact, ...
متن کامل