The press-fit implant impression coping technique.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Nissan and Ghelfan Cagna et al 3. Weinberg LA. Tooth position in relation to the denture base foundation. J Prosthet Dent 1958;8:398-405. 4. Fish EW. Principles of full denture prosthesis. London: John Bale, Sons & Danielsson, Ltd; 1933. p. 1-8. 5. Wright CR. Evaluation of the factors necessary to develop stability in mandibular dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1966;16:414-30. 6. Brill N, Tryde G, Cantor R. The dynamic nature of the lower denture space. J Prosthet Dent 1965;15:401-18. 7. Sheppard IM. Denture base dislodgement during mastication. J Prosthet Dent 1963;13:462-8. 8. Kuebker WA. Denture problems: causes, diagnostic procedures, and clinical treatment. I. Retention problems. Quintessence Int Dent Dig 1984;15:1031-44. 9. Pound E. Lost--fine arts in the fallacy of the ridges. J Prosthet Dent 1954;4:6-16. 10.Fahmy FM, Kharat DU. A study of the importance of the neutral zone in complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:459-62. 11.Wright CR, Swartz WH, Godwin WC. Mandibular denture stability a new concept. Ann Arbor: The Overbeck Co; 1961. p. 29-41. 12.Schole ML. Management of the gagging patient. J Prosthet Dent 1959;9:578-83. 13.Morstad AT, Peterson AD. Postinsertion denture problems. J Prosthet Dent 1968;19:12632. 14.Means CR, Flenniken IE. Gagging--a problem in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1970;23:614-20. 15.Kuebker WA. Denture problems: causes, diagnostic procedures, and clinical treatment. III/IV. Gagging problems and speech problems. Quintessence Int Dent Dig 1984;15:1231-8. 16.Watt DM. Tooth positions on complete dentures. J Dent 1978;6:147-60. 17.Watt DM, MacGregor AR. Designing complete dentures. 2nd ed. Bristol: IOP Publishing Ltd; 1986. p. 1-31. 18.Robinson SC. Physiological placement of artificial anterior teeth. J Can Dent Assoc (Tor) 1969;35:260-6. 19.Payne AG. Factors influencing the position of artificial upper anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1971;26:26-32. 20.Murray CG. Re-establishing natural tooth position in the edentulous environment. Aust Dent J 1978;23:415-21. 21.Rahn AO, Heartwell CM Jr. Textbook of complete dentures. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 1993. p. 352-6. 22.Hardy IR. Technique for use of non-anatomic acrylic posterior teeth. Dent Digest 1942;48:562-6. 23.Lang BR, Razzoog ME. A practical approach to restoring occlusion for edentulous patients. Part II: Arranging the functional and rational mold combination. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:599-606. 24.Gysi A. Practical application of research results in denture construction. J Am Dent Assoc 1929;16:199-223. 25.Sharry JJ. Complete denture prosthodontics. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1974. p. 241-65. 26.Pound E. Esthetic dentures and their phonetic values. J Prosthet Dent 1951;1:98-111. 27.Pound E, Murrell GA. An introduction to denture simplification. Phase II. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29:598-607. 28.Roraff AR. Arranging artificial teeth according to anatomic landmarks. J Prosthet Dent 1977;38:120-30. 29.Halperin AR, Graser GN, Rogoff GS, Plekavich EJ. Mastering the art of complete dentures. Chicago: Quintessence; 1988. p. 125. 30.Sears VH. Principles and technics for complete denture construction. St. Louis: Mosby; 1949. p. 103-8, 279-80. 31.DeVan MM. The concept of neutrocentric occlusion as related to denture stability. J Am Dent Assoc 1954;48:165-9. 32.el-Gheriani AS. A new guide for positioning of maxillary posterior denture teeth. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19:535-8. 33.Lammie GA. Aging changes and the complete lower denture. J Prosthet Dent 1956;6:45064. 34.Martone AL. The phenomenon of function in complete denture prosthodontics. Clinical applications of concepts of functional anatomy and speech science to complete denture prosthodontics. Part VIII. The final phases of denture construction. J Prosthet Dent 1963;13:204-28. 35.Campbell DD. Full denture prosthesis. St. Louis: Mosby; 1924. p. 82-4. 36.Zarb GA, Bolender CL, Hickey JC, Carlsson GE. Boucher’s prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. 10th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1990. p. 363. 37.Beresin VE, Schiesser FJ. The neutral zone in complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:356-67. 38.Fish EW. Using the muscles to stabilize the full lower denture. J Am Dent Assoc 1933;20:2163-9. 39.Matthews E. The polished surfaces. Br Dent J 1961;111:407-11. 40.Grant AA, Johnson W. An introduction to removable denture prosthetics. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1983. p. 24-8. 41.Wright SM. The polished surface contour: a new approach. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:15963. 42.Schlosser RO. Complete denture prosthesis. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1939. p. 183-90. 43.Roberts AL. The effects of outline and form upon denture stability and retention. Dent Clin North Am 1960;4:293-303. 44.Beresin VE, Schiesser FJ, editors. Neutral zone in complete and partial dentures. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1979. p. 15,73-108, 158-83. 45.Martone AL. The phenomenon of function in complete denture prosthodontics. Clinical applications of concepts of functional anatomy and speech science to complete denture prosthodontics. Part VI. The diagnostic phase. J Prosthet Dent 1962;12:817-34. 46.McDonald GT, Larsen HD. Laboratory procedures for the neutral zone denture technique. Quintessence Dent Technol 1985;9:287-90. 47.Rudd KD, Morrow RM. Baseplates and occlusion rims. In: Dental laboratory procedures: complete dentures, volume I. 2nd ed. Morrow RM, Rudd KD, Rhoads JE, editors. St. Louis: Mosby; 1986. p. 90-146. 48.Massad JJ, Connelly ME, Rudd KD, Cagna DR. Occlusal device for diagnostic evaluation of maxillomandibular relationships in edentulous patients: a clinical technique. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:586-90. 49.Smith RA, Cavalcanti AA, Wolfe HE. Arranging and articulating artificial teeth. In: Dental laboratory procedures: complete dentures, volume I. 2nd ed. Morrow RM, Rudd KD, Rhoads JE, editors. St. Louis: Mosby; 1986. p. 223-75. 50.Rudd KD, Morrow RM, Feldmann EE, Espinoza AV, Gorney C. Waxing and processing. In: Dental laboratory procedures: complete dentures, volume I. 2nd ed. Morrow RM, Rudd KD, Rhoads JE, editors. St. Louis: Mosby; 1986. p. 276-311. 51.Rudd KD, Morrow RM, Espinoza AV, Leachman JS. Finishing and polishing. In: Dental laboratory procedures: complete dentures, volume I. 2nd ed. Morrow RM, Rudd KD, Rhoads JE, editors. St. Louis: Mosby; 1986. p. 312-38. 52.Boucher CO. Complete denture prosthodontics – The state of the art. J Prosthet Dent 1975;34:372-83. 53.Fahmi FM. The position of the neutral zone in relation to the alveolar ridge. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:805-9. 54.Ries GE. The neutral zone as applied to oral and facial deformities. In: Neutral zone in complete and partial dentures. 2nd ed. Beresin VE, Schiesser FJ, editors. St. Louis: Mosby; 1978. p. 208-20. 55.Ohkubo C, Hanatani S, Hosoi T, Mizuno Y. Neutral zone approach for denture fabrication for a partial glossectomy patient: a clinic report. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:390-3. 56.Pekkan G, Hekimoglu C, Sahin N. Rehabilitation of the marginal mandibulectomy patient using a modified neutral zone technique: a case report. Braz Dent J 2007;18:83-6. 57.Kokubo Y, Fukushima S, Sato J, Seto K. Arrangement of artificial teeth in the neutral zone after surgical reconstruction of the mandible: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:125-7. 58.Lloyd PM. Complete-denture therapy for the geriatric patient. Dent Clin North Am 1996;40:239-54. 59.Raybin NH. The polished surface of complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1963;13:236-9. 60.Devlin H. Complete dentures: a clinical manual for the general dental practitioner. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002. p. 55-6.
منابع مشابه
The Accuracy of Four Impression-making Techniques in Angulated Implants Based on Vertical Gap
Statement of the Problem Precision of the impression taken from implant positions significantly determines accurate fit of implant-supported prostheses. An imprecise impression may produce prosthesis misfit. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of four impression-making techniques for angulated implants by stereomicroscope through measuring the vertical marginal gaps between the ...
متن کاملAccuracy Comparison of Implant Impression Techniques: A Systematic Review.
BACKGROUND Several studies link the seamless fit of implant-supported prosthesis with the accuracy of the dental impression technique obtained during acquisition. In addition, factors such as implant angulation and coping shape contribute to implant misfit. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to identify the most accurate impression technique and factors affecting the impression accuracy. MAT...
متن کاملA technique for making impressions of deeply placed implants.
aAssistant Professor, Division of Prosthodontics, Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University. bResident, Division of Prosthodontics, Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University. cPrivate practice, Vilnius, Lithuania. dLecturer, Division of Orthodontics, Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University. (J Prosthet Dent 2011;106:204-205)...
متن کاملAccuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
BACKGROUND Accurate recording of implant location is required so that definitive restorations are properly supported and do not place additional stresses on the implants. Movement of impression copings inside the impression material using an open-tray or close-tray impression technique during clinical and laboratory phases may cause inaccuracy in transferring the three-dimensional spatial orien...
متن کاملمقایسه دقت تکنیکهای مختلف قالبگیری در قالبهای سطح اباتمنت در ایمپلنتهای دندانی با طرح All-on-4
Background and Aims: Passive fit of prosthetic frameworks is a major concern in implant dentistry. Impression technique is one of the several variables that may affect the outcome of dental implants. The purpose of this study was to compare the three dimensional accuracy of direct and indirect abutment level implant impressions of ALL-ON-4 treatment plan.Materials and Methods: A reference acryl...
متن کاملEffect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
BACKGROUND With regard to implant-supported prostheses, to date no technique has been proven to guarantee a completely passive fit of prosthetic frameworks. Several clinical variables may affect the precision of impressions, particularly in the presence of implants. PURPOSE To compare the accuracy of implant impressions made with different materials, lengths of impression coping connections, ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
دوره 101 6 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009