Negation As Refutation
نویسنده
چکیده
A refutation mechanism is introduced into logic programming, dual to the usual proof mechanism; then negation is treated via refutation. A four-valued logic is appropriate for the semantics: true, false, neither, both. Inconsistent programs are allowed, but inconsistencies remain localized. The four-valued logic is a well-known one, due to Belnap, and is the simplest example of Ginsberg’s bilattice notion. An efficient implementation based on semantic tableaux is sketched; it reduces to SLD resolution when negations are not involved. The resulting system can give reasonable answers to queries that involve both negation and free variables. Also it gives the same results as Prolog when there are no negations. Finally, an implementation in Prolog is given.
منابع مشابه
Integrity Constraints as Views in Deductice Databases
In this paper we present a refutation procedure to compute goals in a deductive database according to particular views of it. Views are deened by a set of constraints rules. The declarative semantics of the constrained database is deened and the given refutation procedure is proved correct and complete for positive range{restricted databases. The extension of the procedure to deal with negation...
متن کاملIntegrity Constraints as Views in DeductiveDatabases
In this paper we present a refutation procedure to compute goals in a deductive database according to particular views of it. Views are deened by a set of constraints rules. The declarative semantics of the constrained database is deened and the given refutation procedure is proved correct and complete for positive range{restricted databases. The extension of the procedure to deal with negation...
متن کاملA Transformational Approach to Negation in Logic Programming
D A transformation technique is introduced which, given the Horn-clause definitions of a set of predicates p,, synthesizes the definitions of new predicates pi which can be used, under a suitable refutation procedure, to compute the finite failure set of pi. This technique exhibits some computational advantages, such as the possibility of computing nonground negative goals still preserving the ...
متن کاملThe Craig interpolation theorem for prepositional logics with strong negation
This paper deals with propositional calculi with strong negation(N-logics) in which the Craig interpolation theorem holds. N-logics are defined to be axiomatic strengthenings of the intuitionistic calculus enriched with a unary connective called strong negation. There exists continuum of N-logics, but the Craig interpolation theorem holds only in 14 of them. " A propositional calculus with stro...
متن کاملA Graph Calculus for Predicate Logic
We introduce a refutation graph calculus for classical first-order predicate logic, which is an extension of previous ones for binary relations. One reduces logical consequence to establishing that a constructed graph has empty extension, i. e. it represents ⊥. Our calculus establishes that a graph has empty extension by converting it to a normal form, which is expanded to other graphs until we...
متن کامل