Cut elimination and strong separation for substructural logics: An algebraic approach
نویسندگان
چکیده
We develop a general algebraic and proof-theoretic study of substructural logics that may lack associativity, along with other structural rules. Our study extends existing work on (associative) substructural logics over the full Lambek Calculus FL (see e.g. [36, 19, 18]). We present a Gentzen-style sequent system GL that lacks the structural rules of contraction, weakening, exchange and associativity, and can be considered a non-associative formulation of FL. Moreover, we introduce an equivalent Hilbert-style system HL and show that the logic associated with GL and HL is algebraizable, with the variety of residuated lattice-ordered groupoids with unit serving as its equivalent algebraic semantics. Overcoming technical complications arising from the lack of associativity, we introduce a generalized version of a logical matrix and apply the method of quasicompletions to obtain an algebra and a quasiembedding from the matrix to the algebra. By applying the general result to specific cases, we obtain important logical and algebraic properties, including the cut elimination of GL and various extensions, the strong separation of HL, and the finite generation of the variety of residuated lattice-ordered groupoids with unit.
منابع مشابه
An Algebraic Glimpse at Bunched Implications and Separation Logic
We overview the logic of Bunched Implications (BI) and Separation Logic (SL) from a perspective inspired by Hiroakira Ono’s algebraic approach to substructural logics. We propose generalized BI algebras (GBI-algebras) as a common framework for algebras arising via “declarative resource reading”, intuitionistic generalizations of relation algebras and arrow logics and the distributive Lambek cal...
متن کاملAlgebraic proof theory for substructural logics: Cut-elimination and completions
We carry out a unified investigation of two prominent topics in proof theory and order algebra: cut-elimination and completion, in the setting of substructural logics and residuated lattices. We introduce the substructural hierarchy — a new classification of logical axioms (algebraic equations) over full Lambek calculus FL, and show that a stronger form of cutelimination for extensions of FL an...
متن کاملRelevance Principle for Substructural Logics with Mingle and Strong Negation
We introduce intuitionistic and classical substructural logics with structural rules mingle and connective strong negation, and investigate the cut-elimination property and the relevance principle for these logics. The relevance principle does not hold for substructural logics with mingle and usual negation, but holds for those with mingle and strong negation.
متن کاملProof Theory and Algebra in Substructural Logics
It is quite well understood that propositional logics are tightly connected to ordered algebras via algebraic completeness, and because of this connection proof theory is often useful in the algebraic context too. A prominent example is that one deductively proves the interpolation theorem for a given logic in order to derive the algebraic amalgamation property for the corresponding variety as ...
متن کاملMeeting strength in substructural logics
This paper contributes to the theory of hybrid substructural logics, i.e. weak logics given by a Gentzen-style proof theory in which there is only a limited possibility to use structural rules. Following the literature, we use an operator to mark formulas to which the extra structural rules may be applied. New in our approach is that we do not see this ∇ as a modality, but rather as the meet of...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Ann. Pure Appl. Logic
دوره 161 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010