Taxic Homology 5 Overall Similarity
نویسندگان
چکیده
Modified three-taxon analysis (m3ta), a method in which three-taxon statements are produced from a nonadditive binary coding of the original data, has been proposed as a model-free way of assessing monophyly of groups, utilizing the taxic concept of homology. In fact the taxic concept amounts to a model, and, further, one that seems to conflict directly with evolution. M3ta is a type of grouping by all similarities and, like all such methods, would require a clock assumption if the tree were to be interpreted phylogenetically. Groupings based on this method, consequently, are phenetic, and they have little to do with monophyly. It has been proposed to define phylogenetic systematics in terms of grouping only by presences. While popular among advocates of 3ta, such definitions are completely inadequate, both because absences may be apomorphic and because phenetic methods can disagree with phylogenetic ones even when no absences are involved. q 1999 The Willi Hennig Society
منابع مشابه
Taxic homology and three-taxon statement analysis.
Three-taxon statement analysis (3TA) and standard cladistic analysis (SCA) were evaluated relative to propositions of taxic homology. There are definite distinctions between complement relation homologs and paired homologs. The complement relation is discussed, relative to rooting, parsimony, and taxic propositions of homology. The complement relation, as implemented in SCA, makes sense only be...
متن کاملUsing Genetic Networks and Homology to Understand the Evolution of Phenotypic Traits
Homology can have different meanings for different kinds of biologists. A phylogenetic view holds that homology, defined by common ancestry, is rigorously identified through phylogenetic analysis. Such homologies are taxic homologies (=synapomorphies). A second interpretation, "biological homology" emphasizes common ancestry through the continuity of genetic information underlying phenotypic tr...
متن کاملA Hierarchical Theory of Systematics
Beatty (1982) claims that the pattern philosophy of the cladistic method is antagonistic to evolutionary theory. I show that the pattern philosophy is consistent with evolution if one takes into account the nature of hierarchical systems, as elucidated by Allen and Starr (1982). A surprising correspondence is revealed between the hierarchy theory of Allen and Starr (1982) and the pattern philos...
متن کاملHierarchy Theory as the Formal Basis of Evolutionary Theory
ion but provides the biological context for its character states. We might take the palatine bone as a character and thus differences in the shape and orientation of the palatine boss and prong reflect evolutionary changes within this context. Character concepts of this ‘either/or’ sort therefore comprise an aspect of similarity (homogeneity) and aspects of difference (heterogeneity). Teleost f...
متن کاملMorphometrics, Homology, and Phylogenetics: Quantified Characters as Synapomorphies
-It has been claimed that quantified features are inappropriate for phylogenetic analysis. We consider that claim to be true under most conditions for characters discovered by commonly used morphometric methods, including outline-based and conventional multivariate methods. The most important reason these characters are unsuitable is that one of the tests of homology, the test of similarity, ma...
متن کامل