Fast Convex Decomposition for Truthful Social Welfare Approximation
نویسندگان
چکیده
Approximating the optimal social welfare while preserving truthfulness is a well studied problem in algorithmic mechanism design. Assuming that the social welfare of a given mechanism design problem can be optimized by an integer program whose integrality gap is at most α, Lavi and Swamy [1] propose a general approach to designing a randomized α-approximation mechanism which is truthful in expectation. Their method is based on decomposing an optimal solution for the relaxed linear program into a convex combination of integer solutions. Unfortunately, Lavi and Swamy’s decomposition technique relies heavily on the ellipsoid method, which is notorious for its poor practical performance. To overcome this problem, we present an alternative decomposition technique which yields an α(1 + ε) approximation and only requires a quadratic number of calls to an integrality gap verifier.
منابع مشابه
Fast Convex Decomposition for Algorithmic Mechanism Design
Algorithms for the convex decomposition of fractional linear programming solutions are at the core of a class of market protocols proposed by Lavi and Swamy (2011). Due to their generality, these protocols can approximately maximize social welfare in many hard real-world allocation problems while encouraging truthful participation at the same time. Until recently, the only polynomialtime decomp...
متن کاملA Truthful-in-Expectation Mechanism for the Generalized Assignment Problem
We propose a truthful-in-expectation, (1 − 1 e )-approximation mechanism for the generalized assignment auction. In such an auction, each bidder has a knapsack valuation function and bidders’ values for items are private. We present a novel convex optimization program for the auction which results in a maximal-in-distributional-range (MIDR) allocation rule. The presented program contains at lea...
متن کاملTruthful Approximations to Range Voting
We consider the fundamental mechanism design problem of approximate social welfare maximization under general cardinal preferences on a finite number of alternatives and without money. The wellknown range voting scheme can be thought of as a non-truthful mechanism for exact social welfare maximization in this setting. With m being the number of alternatives, we exhibit a randomized truthfulin-e...
متن کاملGreedy Mechanism Design for Truthful Combinatorial Auctions
We study the combinatorial auction problem, in which a set of objects are to be distributed amongst selfish bidders with the goal of maximizing social welfare. We consider mechanisms that apply greedy algorithms, and ask to what extent truthful greedy mechanisms can find approximate solutions to the combinatorial auction problem. We associate the notion of greediness with a broad class of algor...
متن کاملA The Computational Complexity of Truthfulness in Combinatorial Auctions
Is it possible to design truthful polynomial-time mechanisms that achieve a good approximation ratio? This is one of the basic questions in Algorithmic Mechanism Design. The focus of most of the work on this question is on settings in which on one hand there exists a truthful algorithm that maximizes the social welfare (VCG), but on the other hand computing the optimal solution is computational...
متن کامل