Uncertainty Reasoning for Ontologies with General TBoxes in Description Logic
نویسندگان
چکیده
We present a reasoning procedure for ontologies with uncertainty described in Description Logic (DL) which include General TBoxes, i.e., include cycles and General Concept Inclusions (GCIs). For this, we consider the description language ALCU , in which uncertainty parameters are associated with ABoxes and TBoxes, and which allows General TBoxes. Using this language as a basis, we then present a tableau algorithm which encodes the semantics of the input knowledge base as a set of assertions and linear and/or nonlinear arithmetic constraints on certainty variables. By tuning the uncertainty parameters in the knowledge base, different notions of uncertainty can be modeled and reasoned with, within the same framework. Our reasoning procedure is deterministic, and hence avoids possible empirical intractability in standard DL with General TBoxes. We further illustrate the need for blocking when reasoning with General TBoxes in the context of ALCU .
منابع مشابه
Reasoning about Actions using Description Logics with general TBoxes (Revised Version)
Action formalisms based on description logics (DLs) have recently been introduced as decidable fragments of well-established action theories such as the Situation Calculus and the Fluent Calculus. However, existing DL action formalisms fail to include general TBoxes, which are the standard tool for formalising ontologies in modern description logics. We define a DL action formalism that admits ...
متن کاملDescription Logic Actions with general TBoxes: a Pragmatic Approach
Action formalisms based on description logics (DLs) have recently been introduced as decidable fragments of well-established action theories such as the Situation Calculus and the Fluent Calculus. However, existing DL action formalisms fail to include general TBoxes, which are the standard tool for formalising ontologies in modern description logics. We define a DL action formalism that admits ...
متن کاملReasoning About Actions Using Description Logics with General TBoxes
Action formalisms based on description logics (DLs) have recently been introduced as decidable fragments of well-established action theories such as the Situation Calculus and the Fluent Calculus. However, existing DL action formalisms fail to include general TBoxes, which are the standard tool for formalising ontologies in modern description logics. We define a DL action formalism that admits ...
متن کاملA Tractable Approach to ABox Abduction over Description Logic Ontologies
ABox abduction is an important reasoning mechanism for description logic ontologies. It computes all minimal explanations (sets of ABox assertions) whose appending to a consistent ontology enforces the entailment of an observation while keeps the ontology consistent. We focus on practical computation for a general problem of ABox abduction, called the query abduction problem, where an observati...
متن کاملModel-based Most Specific Concepts in Description Logics with Value Restrictions
Non-standard inferences are particularly useful in the bottom-up construction of ontologies in description logics. One of the more common non-standard reasoning tasks is the most specific concept (msc) for an ABox-individual. In this paper we present similar non-standard reasoning task: most specific concepts for models (model-mscs). We show that, although they look similar to ABox-mscs their c...
متن کامل