Reverse transcription-PCR for t(11;18)(q21;q21) staging and monitoring in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma.

PURPOSE Subclinical dissemination as well as persistence after therapy may be difficult to assess on clinical and histologic examinations in patients with mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. We have analyzed the use of reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) for the detection of t(11;18)(q21;q21) in histologically infiltrated and normal biopsies at diagnosis and during follow-up to determine its clinical and prognostic effect. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Twenty-one patients with t(11;18)(q21;q21)+ MALT lymphoma were included in this retrospective study. Presence of t(11;18)(q21;q21) was determined by RT-PCR done on 316 biopsies of various tissues obtained during staging and follow-up. RESULTS Infiltration with lymphoma was histologically detected in 67 of 316 biopsies, whereas molecular infiltration was established in 104 of 316 biopsies. All histologically positive specimens were also positive in RT-PCR. There was a good concordance (P = 0.0001) between histology and RT-PCR at the time of disease presentation with only one further infiltration site identified by RT-PCR. In 8 of 12 patients with persistent lymphoma, RT-PCR revealed tumor infiltration in histologically unsuspected sites. Eight of nine treated patients with histologic and clinical complete remission (CR) remained RT-PCR positive. CR on RT-PCR was achieved later than histologic CR (between 13-59 months) without any further therapy in five of these eight patients; only one patient with persistent t(11;18)(q21;q21) relapsed histologically. CONCLUSIONS This study shows the potential of RT-PCR for t(11;18)(q21;q21) done on routine paraffin-embedded specimens to identify disseminated disease in tissues otherwise not diagnostic of MALT lymphoma involvement. T(11;18)(q21;q21) persistence in patients with clinical and histologic CR does not necessarily require therapeutic intervention.