The Choices for Scandinavian Social Democracy in Comparative Perspective
نویسنده
چکیده
Scandinavian social democracy represents one of the most systematic attempts to shape economic institutions and policies in pursuit of equality and full employment. Increasingly, however, these goals have eluded governments, and their institutional supports have eroded. This paper seeks to understand this shift through a comparative analysis that places particular emphasis on the interaction between macroeconomic policies and wage-bargaining institutions. It is argued that the nature of this interaction, and the associated economic effects, have been changed by new technology, capital market integration, and service-sector expansion. As a result, centralized wage-bargaining institutions and accommodating macroeconomic policy regimes have been undermined, and social democracy increasingly faces a choice between the promotion of equality and employment for all.
منابع مشابه
Political performance and types of democracy: Findings from comparative studies
This essay explores the relationships between political performance profiles and major types of democracy from a comparative perspective. The article focuses attention mainly on the political performance of majoritarian and non-majoritarian government, democracies with small and large numbers of veto players, hybrid regimes, presidentialism and parliamentary government, referendum democracy and...
متن کاملHow the Public Views Democracy and its Competitors in East Asia: Taiwan in Comparative Perspective. Taiwan Democracy Project, CDDRL
On May 25-26, the Taiwan Democracy Project (with support from the Taipei Economic and Cultural Office in San Francisco) held its seventh annual conference entitled "How the Public Views Democracy and its Competitors in East Asia: Taiwan in Comparative Perspective.” The conference, cosponsored by the Program for East Asia Democratic Studies at National Taiwan University, brought together leading...
متن کاملA Study of the Intellectual Roots of Negotiation Planning and Its Analysis from the Perspective of Western Democracy and Religious Democracy
Planning is one of the basic tools to achieve optimal living conditions. In the meantime, negotiation is one of the most important approaches in the new planning systems, which has a special place in the current era of urban planning and governance. Negotiation planning or in other words discourse is one of the new methods in urban studies that is widely used, especially in advanced democratic ...
متن کاملPolitical Artifacts In Scandinavia: An American Perspective
How does it stand with Scandinavian attempts to democratize technological choice? How can those efforts improve our grasp of the politics of technology? These are questions posed by an outsider. As a reader of books and articles, I have followed the projects carried out during the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, work that sought to politicize technological choices in Scandinavian countries and to illum...
متن کاملRepresentative democracy and the implementation of majority-preferred alternatives
In this paper, we study representative democracy, one of the most popular classes of collective decision-making mechanisms, and contrast it with direct democracy. In a direct democracy, individuals have the opportunity to vote over the alternatives in every choice problem the population faces. In a representative democracy, the population commits to a candidate ex ante who will then make choice...
متن کامل