Reviewer Guidance
ثبت نشده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Author's response to reviews Title: Improving health promotion through central rating of interventions: the need for responsive guidance Authors:
Results: The phrase 'lack of norms' is also used here. Without the body of the paper, it is difficult to understand. conclusion: could you say who the guidance should be developed by and for whom? The conclusion could be written in stronger, clearer language to encourage the reader to turn to the whole paper. We thank the reviewer for this suggestion. We have tried to improve the formulation of...
متن کاملManager-Specific Effects on Earnings Guidance: An Analysis of Top Executive Turnovers
We investigate how managers contribute to the provision of earnings guidance by examining the association between top executive turnovers and guidance. Although firm and industry characteristics are important determinants of guidance, we conclude that CEOs participate in firm-level policy decisions, whereas CFOs are involved in the formation or discussion of guidance. Among firms that historica...
متن کاملBeyond Politization of Technology and Sustainability: A Plea for Visioning
Most protagonists of sustainable development ignore modern insights in the nature of technology, which has led to an emphasis on technological solutions. The notable exception is transition management. However, both social construction of technology and transition management have been criticized as ignoring distributions of power in society, and for not offering guidance in the choice of the mo...
متن کاملReviewers: the soul of a scientific journal
Peer review system is like democracy: it is absolutely imperfect, but the best available. It allows criticism to articles, suggestions for improvement under different perspectives and allows the editor to make a fairer decision about the future of an article. The reviewer is the soul of a medical journal like International Brazilian Journal of Urology. He/she dictates the quality of publishing,...
متن کاملTen ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers
As an expert reviewer, it is sometimes necessary to ensure a paper is rejected. This can sometimes be achieved by highlighting improper statistical practice. This technical note provides guidance on how to critique the statistical analysis of neuroimaging studies to maximise the chance that the paper will be declined. We will review a series of critiques that can be applied universally to any n...
متن کامل