A method to adjust for ascertainment bias in the evaluation of cancer registry data.

نویسندگان

  • Mahdi Fallah
  • Elham Kharazmi
چکیده

Using the trend of age-standardized incidence rate of cancers (ASR) is inaccurate for registration with incomplete reporting, especially in developing registries. The relative age-standardized ratio (RASR) is a new measure that takes ascertainment bias of registration into account. RASR is calculated from the ASR for each cancer divided by the ASR for leukemia. Leukemia was chosen as the reference because its ASR is rather constant over time in valid registries. The adjusted relative age-standardized rate (ARASR with same unit as ASR) is calculated by multiplying the RASR for a specific cancer in a particular year by the sum of ASRs of that cancer over the years for which a trend is being determined and then dividing result by the sum of RASRs of the cancer for those years. Two likely assumptions are behind use of ARASR, first, constant ASR of leukemia over time, second, if under/over-registration occurs, it happens for all cancers to the same extent (random under/over-reporting). Using the ARASR with empirical data of valid Finnish and SEER cancer registries proved that trend of ASRs for each cancer is almost equal to its ARASR. Using trends of ARASRs instead of ASRs in a registry with incomplete data collection in first years of registration demonstrated more realistic results. In conclusion, the ARASR is more accurate than the ASR for studying cancer incidence trends in registries with incomplete reporting. ARASRs in different countries or different times are comparable since they are age-standardized. Moreover, comparison between trends of ASRs and ARASRs can be used as a test for validity of registration.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Bayesian modelling of imperfect ascertainment methods in cancer studies.

Tumour registry linkage, chart review and patient self-report are all commonly used ascertainment methods in cancer epidemiology. These methods are used for estimating the incidence or prevalence of different cancer types in a population, and for investigating the effects of possible risk factors for cancer. Tumour registry linkage is often treated as a gold standard, but in fact none of these ...

متن کامل

برآورد میزان بروز سرطان معده در استان اردبیل با استفاده از روش صید- بازصید براساس اطلاعات ثبت سرطان مبتنی بر جمعیت

  Background and Objectives : Awareness of the cancer incidence is essential for cancer prevention and control programs. Capture-recapture methods have been recommended for reducing bias and increasing the accuracy of cancer incidence estimation. This study aimed to estimate the incidence of gastric cancer by the capture-recapture method based on Ardabil population-based cancer registry data. ...

متن کامل

Prevalence of Bladder Cancer in the Kerman Province, Southeastern Iran, using the Complete Prevalence Method

Background: Bladder cancer is the 10th most common cancer worldwide. We aimed to assess the prevalence of bladder cancer in the Kerman Province, in southeast Iran. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we used data on 1272 patients with bladder cancer registered in the Kerman population-based cancer registry from 2014 to 2017. There were two parts of data including observed dat...

متن کامل

A comparative study of quantitative mapping methods for bias correction of ERA5 reanalysis precipitation data

This study evaluates the ability of different quantitative mapping (QM) methods as a bias correction technique for ERA5 reanalysis precipitation data. Climate type and geographical location can affect the performance of the bias correction method due to differences in precipitation characteristics. For this purpose, ERA5 reanalysis precipitation data for the years 1989-2019 for 10 selected syno...

متن کامل

An Application of Non-response Bias Reduction Using Propensity Score Methods

‎In many statistical studies some units do not respond to a number or all of the questions‎. ‎This situation causes a problem called non-response‎. ‎Bias and variance inflation are two important consequences of non-response in surveys‎. ‎Although increasing the sample size can prevented variance inflation‎, ‎but cannot necessary adjust for the non-response bias‎. ‎Therefore a number of methods ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP

دوره 8 1  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2007