Evaluating Clinical Decision Support Systems
ثبت نشده
چکیده
There are a limited number of scientific studies concerned with the evaluation of DSS in general, and even less concerned with the evaluation of DSS in a clinical context. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical DSS at the Department of Orthopedics at Sahlgrenska University Hospital in order to answer how one should evaluate clinical DSS. We have in our study created a research framework that assesses the effectiviness of clinical DSS within a hospital context. The framework examines if a clinical DSS fullfills a set of clinical DSS key contributions and what influence these key contributions have on decision outcome quality, decision-making process efficiency, and decision maker satisfaction. A qualitative case study has been done in order to measure these factors, and our findings shows that the clinical DSS used at the Department of Orthopedics at Sahlgrenska University Hospital is effective overall. However, not all of these factors were conclusive due to the early phase of system use. Our study also shows a number of new findings that haven't been present in existing theory on clinical DSS, where the most important one highlights the role of law and regulation with regards to clinical DSS evaluation and use. Evaluating Clinical Decision Support Systems Dahlstedt & Roos
منابع مشابه
Drug-Drug Interaction Clinical Decision Support Systems: Advantages, Challenges and Barriers, and Strategies to Overcome Them
Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are a common source of preventable medical errors in inpatient and outpatient settings of both developed and developing countries. When two or more drugs are simultaneously prescribed, interactions between their effects may result in preventable adverse events such as damages to vital organs, frequent hospitalizations, prolonged length of hospital stay, and increas...
متن کاملDrug-Drug Interaction Clinical Decision Support Systems: Advantages, Challenges and Barriers, and Strategies to Overcome Them
Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are a common source of preventable medical errors in inpatient and outpatient settings of both developed and developing countries. When two or more drugs are simultaneously prescribed, interactions between their effects may result in preventable adverse events such as damages to vital organs, frequent hospitalizations, prolonged length of hospital stay, and increas...
متن کاملChallenges in Evaluating Complex Decision Support Systems Challenges in Evaluating Decision Support Systems with Complex Outputs: Lessons from Design-a-Trial
Decision support system developers and users agree on the need for rigorous evaluations of system performance and impact. Fortunately, evaluating simple reminder systems is relatively easy, because there is usually a reasonable gold standard of decision quality and it is feasible to blind such studies. However, when the system generates complex or distinctive output (such as a critique, a parag...
متن کاملClinical Decision Support System: An Effective Tool to Detect and Manage Drug-Laboratory Interactions
Lack of proper linkage between a patient’s medications and the results of laboratory tests can lead to common medication errors called drug-laboratory interactions (DLIs). DLIs are among the major types of preventable medication errors in the treatment process. Application of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) for physicians and other health care providers to decrease DLIs can effectivel...
متن کاملClinical Decision Support System: An Effective Tool to Detect and Manage Drug-Laboratory Interactions
Lack of proper linkage between a patient’s medications and the results of laboratory tests can lead to common medication errors called drug-laboratory interactions (DLIs). DLIs are among the major types of preventable medication errors in the treatment process. Application of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) for physicians and other health care providers to decrease DLIs can effectivel...
متن کامل