A Social Identity Threat and Experienced Affect: the Distinct Roles of Intergroup Attributions and Social Identification
نویسنده
چکیده
I investigated the moderating role of ingroup identification on the relationship between the affective state experienced and the causal attributions made for social identity threatening outcomes of intergroup comparisons. For people under such conditions, on the basis of prior research, I expected that affect unpleasantness is positively correlated with attributions for outgroup merits to the extent that social identification is strong. Furthermore, I hypothesized that perceived legitimacy of the intergroup status differential mediates such a relationship. I found support for these predictions by providing psychology students with bogus research results concerning the lower academic achievements of their own group relative to medicine students. Combining the findings of two distinct literatures, the present study traces the sources of the affective processes that social identity threatening intergroup comparisons set in motion as a function of ingroup identification when people make ingroup relevant attributions. Current Research in Social Psychology (Vol. 10, No. 10) (Costarelli)
منابع مشابه
Attributions to Low Group Effort Can Make You Feel Better: the Distinct Roles of In-group Identification, Legitimacy of Intergroup Status, and Controllability Perceptions
One experiment investigates the process whereby attributing to low group effort the social status of an in-group that is perceived as being illegitimately low can spare group members the unpleasant affective consequences of a threat to one’s social identity. Specifically, this is the case because such attributions increase the perception that in-group failings can be controlled and, thus, are u...
متن کاملSelf-directed Negative Affect: the Distinct Roles of Ingroup Identification and Outgroup Derogation
Prior research has shown that negative affect directed at the self follows from intergroup evaluation. Building on social identity theory, we hypothesized that ingroup identification impacts on felt self-directed negative affect after making intergroup differentiating evaluations. Additionally, prior work has demonstrated that people downgrade the outgroup to the extent that they identify with ...
متن کاملConfirming the Stereotype: How Stereotype Threat, Performance Feedback, and Academic Identification affect Identity and Future Performance
This study investigates the post-performance effects of stereotype threat. Undergraduate students (N = 130) classified as either stronglyor weaklyidentified with academics were told a diagnostic anagram task either typically shows poorer performance for their gender (stereotype threat) or no gender differences (no stereotype threat), and received arbitrary positive or negative feedback on an in...
متن کاملSocial identity modifies face perception: an ERP study of social categorization.
Two studies examined whether social identity processes, i.e. group identification and social identity threat, amplify the degree to which people attend to social category information in early perception [assessed with event-related brain potentials (ERPs)]. Participants were presented with faces of Muslims and non-Muslims in an evaluative priming task while ERPs were measured and implicit evalu...
متن کاملCollective narcissism moderates the effect of in-group image threat on intergroup hostility.
Results of 4 experiments demonstrated that under in-group image threat collective narcissism predicts retaliatory intergroup hostility. Under in-group criticism (vs. praise) collective narcissists expressed intention to harm the offending out-group but not other, nonoffending out-groups. This effect was specific to collective narcissism and was replicated in studies that accounted for the overl...
متن کامل