Voting, Punishment, and Public Goods
نویسندگان
چکیده
Researchers have found that voting can help increase voluntary contributions to a public good—provided enforcement through a third party. Not all collective agreements, however, guarantee third-party enforcement. We design an experiment to explore whether a voting rule with and without endogenous punishment increases contributions to a public good. Our results suggest that voting by itself does not increase cooperation, but if voters can punish violators, contributions increase significantly. While costly punishment increases contributions at the price of lower efficiency, overall efficiency for a voting-withpunishment rule still exceeds the level observed for a voting-without-punishment rule. (JEL C92, D72, H41)
منابع مشابه
Why people punish in public goods games , and on whom punishment is most effective : Conventional wisdoms reconsidered
Theoretical and experimental research underscores the role of punishment in the evolution of cooperation between humans. Experiments using the public goods game have repeatedly shown that in cooperative social environments, punishment makes cooperation flourish, and that withholding punishment makes cooperation collapse. In less cooperative social environments, where antisocial punishment has b...
متن کاملAlleviation and Sanctions in Social Dilemma Games
This paper reports an experiment which compares behaviour in two punishment regimes: (i) a standard public goods game with punishment in which subjects are given the opportunity to punish other group members (democratic punishment regime) and (ii) a public goods game environment where all group members exogenously experience an automatic reduction of their income (irrespective of their behaviou...
متن کاملPositive interactions promote public cooperation.
The public goods game is the classic laboratory paradigm for studying collective action problems. Each participant chooses how much to contribute to a common pool that returns benefits to all participants equally. The ideal outcome occurs if everybody contributes the maximum amount, but the self-interested strategy is not to contribute anything. Most previous studies have found punishment to be...
متن کاملTrust, Punishment, and Cooperation Across 18 Societies: A Meta-Analysis.
Punishment promotes contributions to public goods, but recent evidence suggests that its effectiveness varies across societies. Prior theorizing suggests that cross-societal differences in trust play a key role in determining the effectiveness of punishment, as a form of social norm enforcement, to promote cooperation. One line of reasoning is that punishment promotes cooperation in low-trust s...
متن کاملGroup Identity and Pro-Social Punishment
Cooperation is important but difficult to achieve in social dilemmas. It is even more challenging to promote cooperation among individuals from diverse backgrounds. In this paper, we design a lab experiment to investigate how group identity influences cooperation and peer punishment under the voluntary contribution mechanism of public goods. Artificial groups are created in the lab through rand...
متن کامل