Beliefs, obligations, intentions, and desires as components in an agent architecture
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper we discuss how cognitive attitudes like beliefs, obligations, intentions and desires can be represented as components with input/output functionality. We study how to break down an agent specification into a specification of individual components and a specification of their coordination. A typical property discussed at the individual component specification level is whether the input is included in the output, and a typical property discussed at the coordination level is whether beliefs override desires to ensure realism. At the individual level we show how proof rules of so-called input/output logics correspond to properties of functionality descriptions, and at the coordination level we show how global constraints coordinating the components formalize coherence properties.
منابع مشابه
From Desires, Obligations and Norms to Goals
Traditional models of agents based on Beliefs, Desires and Intentions usually only include either desires or goals. Therefore the process whereby goals arise from desires is given scant attention. In this paper we argue that the inclusion of both desires and goals in the same model can be important, particularly in a Multi-Agent System context, where other sources of individual motivation such ...
متن کاملAn Alternative Classification of Agent Types based on BOID Conflict Resolution
In this paper, we introduce an alternative classification of agent types based on the BOID architecture. According to BOID, agents consist of at least four components called beliefs, obligations, intentions, and desires. The output of the different components may conflict and these conflicts are solved by an ordering function that determines in which order components should generate outputs. It...
متن کاملResolving Conflicts between Beliefs, Obligations, Intentions, and Desires
This paper provides a logical analysis of conflicts between informational, motivational and deliberative attitudes such as beliefs, obligations, intentions, and desires. The contributions are twofold. First, conflict resolutions are classified based on agent types, and formalized in an extension of Reiter’s normal default logic. Second, several desiderata for conflict resolutions are introduced...
متن کاملA Classification of Cognitive Agents
In this paper we discuss a generic component of a cognitive agent architecture that merges beliefs, obligations, intentions and desires into goals. The output of belief, obligation, intention and desire components may conflict and the way the conflicts are resolved determines the type of the agent. For component based cognitive agents, we introduce an alternative classification of agent types b...
متن کاملDecision-Theoretic Deliberation under Bounded Rationality
Leendert van der Torre CWI Amsterdam [email protected] 1 The challenge of decision-theoretic deliberation Agent theory proposes to model the behavior of complex software systems in terms of mental attitudes like belief, desires, goals, intentions and obligations, ranging from, e.g., the PRS system [7] to the more recent BOID architecture [3]. Decision-theoretic deliberation captures concepts and rea...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Int. J. Intell. Syst.
دوره 20 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005