Hall v. Florida: the Supreme Court’s Guidance in Implementing Atkins
نویسنده
چکیده
Founded in 1947, the University of New Mexico School of Law is a vibrant, diverse community of outstanding faculty, students, and alumni who are making a difference across the country and around the world. The School, which offers a rich and engaged classroom experience guided by faculty members who are leaders in their fields, is an " acknowledged " leader in the fields of clinical education, American Indian law, and natural resources and environmental law. The University of New Mexico School of Law Legal Studies eJournal contains abstracts, works in progress, and published papers from our faculty. For more information see:
منابع مشابه
Mental retardation and the death penalty: a guide to State Legislative issues.
The interest in State Legislatures in the topic of mental retardation and the death penalty has obviously heightened with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Atkins v. Virginia, 122 S.Ct. 2242 (June 20, 2002). The purpose of this document is to provide legislators and advocates with guidance in implementing the Atkins decision, so that each State’s death penalty legislation is in full...
متن کاملThe American Psychiatric Association's resource document on mental retardation and capital sentencing: implementing Atkins v. Virginia.
State legislatures need guidance in implementing the United States Supreme Court's decision in Atkins v. Virginia barring execution of mentally retarded offenders. In this Resource Document, the American Psychiatric Association's Council on Psychiatry and Law, the component charged with developing policies and positions relating to forensic psychiatry, recommends statutory language addressing t...
متن کاملCommentary: Atkins and clinical practice.
The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law’s Committee on the Developmentally Disabled, founded in 1990, has continually grappled with the inequities faced by persons with mental retardation within the criminal justice system. Not the least of our concerns has been capital sentencing and execution of disabled defendants. Indeed, the Committee cut its teeth on the 1989 Supreme Court decision...
متن کاملThe Argument for According Life Without Parole Its Own Category of Heightened Review Under the Eighth Amendment After Graham v. Florida WILLIAM W. BERRY III
The Supreme Court has traditionally applied the Eighth Amendment differently to capital and non-capital cases based on the longstanding notion that “death-is-different.” In the recent case of Graham v. Florida, however, the Supreme Court applied its “evolving standards of decency” standard, heretofore reserved for capital cases, to a non-capital case. The Court held that the Eighth Amendment pr...
متن کاملPolicy Forum: Confusion Worse Confounded—The Supreme Court’s GAAR Decisions
This article analyzes the Supreme Court of Canada’s decisions in Canada Trustco v. The Queen and Mathew v. The Queen, the first cases heard by the court involving the application of the general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR). The article begins with a review of the case law, followed by an examination of the Supreme Court’s statements with respect to statutory interpretation in general. The heart o...
متن کامل