Gingival microleakage of class V composite restorations with fiber inserts.
نویسندگان
چکیده
AIM This study investigated the effect of different fiber inserts (glass and polyethylene), bonding agents, and resin composites on the gingival margin microleakage of class V composite restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixty premolars were sterilized and mounted in acrylic resin bases. Class V cavities were prepared buccally and lingually, 1 mm below the cementoenamel junction, comprising 12 groups (n = 10). In the experimental groups fiber inserts were cut and placed at the gingival seat, while the control groups had no inserts. Combinations of two composite materials, Filtek-Z250 and Filtek-LS (3M-ESPE), and four bonding agents, Clearfil SE bond (Kuraray) (C), Scotch Bond Multipurpose (3M-ESPE) (SB), Prime and Bond NT (Dentsply) (PB), and Filtek-LS (3M-ESPE) (LS) were used. Restorations were incrementally inserted and polymerized for 40s. Specimens were then stored in distilled water for 7 days and thermocycled for 500 cycles. Teeth surfaces were sealed with nail polish except for 1 mm around restoration margins and immersed in 2% red procion dye. Teeth were then sectioned buccolingually and dye penetration was assessed with five-point scale. Data were statistically-analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis, ANOVA and Tukey's tests (α = 5%). RESULTS Mean microleakage scores varied from 0.40 (Groups C, C with polyethylene, LS, LS with polyethylene) to 1.50 (SB). CONCLUSION Different bonding agents led to differences in microleakage scores where C and LS showed significantly lower microleakage than PB. SB had highest mean microleakage score, however, incorporation of fibers resulted in significant reduction in microleakage. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Class V resin composite restorations bonded with a total-etch adhesive had a significant reduction in mean microleakage scores when glass or polyethylene fibers were placed at the gingival cavo-surface margin. In contrast, for two self-etch adhesive systems, the incorporation of fibers had no significant effect on mean microleakage scores.
منابع مشابه
Microleakage of Posterior Composite Restorations with Fiber Inserts Using two Adhesives after ging
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Microleakage is one of the most frequent problems associated with resin composites, especially at the gingival margin of posterior restorations. Insertion of fibers in composite restorations can reduce the total amount of composite and help to decrease the shrinkage. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of polyethylene fiber inserts on gingival microle...
متن کاملاثر سه روش مختلف ترمیم بر میزان ریزنشت جینجیوالی کامپوزیت با پایه سایلوران در ترمیم های کلاس II
Background and purpose: Microleakage occurs in posterior composite restorations due to polymerization shrinkage. In recent years low shrinkage silorane-based composites have been introduced to reduce microleakage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of three different restoration techniques on gingival microleakage of a silorane-based composite in class II restorations. Materials ...
متن کاملThe Effect of Fluid Composite as Gingival Layer on Microleakage of Class II Composite Restorations
Introduction: Fluid composites have been suggested as gingival layer beneath class II composite restorations to improve marginal integrity and reduce microleakage. This in-vitro study evaluated the influence of fluid composites as gingival layer on microleakage of class II packable, microhybrid, and fiber-reinforced composite restorations with the margins below the cementoenamel junc-
متن کاملمقایسه آزمایشگاهی اثر Rebonding بر ریزنشت ترمیمهای کلاس V کامپوزیت با استفاده از دو رزین با ویسکوزیته پایین
Background and Aims: Although composite resin restorations have many advantages, they can lead to several clinical problems. The primary reason for these problems is microleakage. The aim of this study was to compare the rebonding effect on microleakage of class V composite restorations using two low viscosity resins.Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 60 class V composite restoratio...
متن کاملMicroleakage Evaluation of Class II Composite Resin Restorations with Different Thicknesses of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer
Background and Aim: One of the weaknesses of Class II composite resin restorations is gingival microleakage which contributes to postoperative sensitivity and secondary caries. The aim was to evaluate the microleakage in Class II composite resin restorations with different thicknesses of resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI). Materials and Methods: In this in-vitro study, standardized Class II s...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The journal of contemporary dental practice
دوره 14 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013