The Wendland case--withdrawing life support from incompetent patients who are not terminally ill.

نویسندگان

  • Bernard Lo
  • Laurie Dornbrand
  • Leslie E Wolf
  • Michelle Groman
چکیده

LMOST all patients want their family members to make decisions about life-sustaining treatment for them if they become incompetent.1,2 Asking family members to make such decisions is standard clinical practice and has strong ethical justification.3-5 However, dilemmas arise when family members disagree about life-sustaining treatment. In an important, unanimous decision, the California Supreme Court sharply restricted the authority of a patient’s wife, who was also her husband’s conservator, to limit life-sustaining interventions in the face of opposition from the patient’s mother.6 Unlike most incompetent patients for whom decisions must be made about life-sustaining interventions, this patient was conscious and was expected to survive for many years if the interventions were continued. If the ruling in this case were extended to other clinical situations, a patient could be subjected to burdensome interventions that offered little clinical benefit and that the patient might well not have wanted.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Respiratory support withdrawal in intensive care units: families, physicians and nurses views on two hypothetical clinical scenarios

INTRODUCTION Evidence suggests that dying patients' physical and emotional suffering is inadequately treated in intensive care units. Although there are recommendations regarding decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapy, deciding on withdrawal of life support is difficult, and it is also difficult to decide who should participate in this decision. METHODS We distributed a self-administered ...

متن کامل

Attitudes of college students about physician-assisted suicide: the influence of life experiences, religiosity, and belief in autonomy.

This study describes attitudes of college students about physician-assisted suicide, analyzes key factors that predict attitudes on this issue, and compares these attitudes with those regarding other forms of end-of-life actions. Data were collected via personal interviews with 200 randomly selected students at a 4-year college. A majority of respondents believe that a physician should be abl...

متن کامل

Physician-assisted suicide: three crucial distinctions.

In Part I discusses whether there is a sustainable distinction between withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining measures and physician-assisted suicide. By segregating those who choose to end their lives into two groups, albeit with considerable overlap, the state can exert its general interest in preserving life and preventing suicide where it has the greatest interest and justification for ...

متن کامل

Medical decisions concerning the end of life: a discussion with Japanese physicians.

OBJECTIVES Life-sustaining treatment at the end of life gives rise to many ethical problems in Japan. Recent surveys of Japanese physicians suggested that they tend to treat terminally ill patients aggressively. We studied why Japanese physicians were reluctant to withhold or withdraw life-support from terminally ill patients and what affected their decisions. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS A qualit...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The New England journal of medicine

دوره 346 19  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2002