Re: "Lies and coercion: why psychiatrists should not participate in police and intelligence interrogations".
نویسنده
چکیده
Police interrogators routinely use deceptive techniques to obtain confessions from criminal suspects. The United States Executive Branch has attempted to justify coercive interrogation techniques in which physical or mental pain and suffering may be used during intelligence interrogations of persons labeled unlawful combatants. It may be appropriate for law enforcement, military, or intelligence personnel who are not physicians to use such techniques. However, forensic psychiatry ethical practice requires honesty, striving for objectivity, and respect for persons. Deceptive and coercive interrogation techniques violate these moral values. When a psychiatrist directly uses, works with others who use, or trains others to use deceptive or coercive techniques to obtain information in police, military, or intelligence interrogations, the psychiatrist breaches basic principles of ethics.
منابع مشابه
"Enhanced" interrogation of detainees: do psychologists and psychiatrists participate?
After revelations of participation by psychiatrists and psychologists in interrogation of prisoners at Guantánamo Bay and Central Intelligence Agency secret detention centers, the American Psychiatric Association and the American Psychological Association adopted Position Statements absolutely prohibiting their members from participating in torture under any and all circumstances, and, to a lim...
متن کاملInvestigative Interviewing for the Purposes of Gathering Intelligence Unchartered Waters : Social Science in Intelligence Interviewing Contexts
Contrary to the harsh ‘enhanced interrogation’ techniques employed during CIA operations on the War on Terror, contemporary research demonstrates that rapport building is a more effective way of achieving positive outcomes in interviews with general offender populations. Comparatively less research has explored the role of rapport with recalcitrant suspects, particularly suspected terrorists. W...
متن کاملRestriction of the Rights and Coercion of Patients in a Psychiatric Hospital: The Opinion of People with Mental Disorders and Psychiatrists
Restriction of the rights of patients in a psychiatric hospital, isolation and fixation, compulsory treatment, and round-the-clock monitoring are negatively perceived by them, contribute to the stigma of a psychiatric hospital, and prevent timely access to psychiatric help. Objectives: We assessed the opinions of patients in psychiatric hospitals and psychiatrists about coercion and violence i...
متن کاملJuror Beliefs About Police Interrogations, False Confessions, and Expert Testimony
Although there has been a rapid expansion in research on police interrogations and false confessions, little is known about the beliefs of potential jurors as to these issues. In collaboration with a trial research firm, we recruited 461 jury-eligible men and women who matched the demographic characteristics of jury pools in several states. Surrogate jurors responded to questions and statements...
متن کاملنقش تغییر موضوع و نقض اصول گرایس توسط متهم در بازجوییهامطالعة موردی در آگاهی تهران بزرگ- نگار مومنی/ سیروس عزیزی
Role of Topic Shift and Violence of Grice Principles in Interrogation: Forensic Linguistics NegarMomeni[1] CyrousAzizi[2] Received:2011/02/04 Accepted:2015/04/06 Abstract Forensic linguistics is a new interdisciplinary branch of applied linguistics and law which utilizes language and linguistic evidence to analyze spoken and written texts technically. It helps police and ju...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
دوره 35 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006