Perceptions About the WTO Trade Institutions
نویسندگان
چکیده
This article, based on a lecture given at the inauguration ceremony for the new Advisory Centre on WTO Law, describes the broader world trading landscape into which this new Centre emerges. Taking into account the possible implications of the events on September 11, this article provides a brief analysis of the current trade policy climate, asserting the necessity of institutions for the successful functioning of markets. After a short institutional history of the GATT}WTO, the author describes the importance of institutional rules, treaty text, and practice for the success of the WTO and presents the current debate over what the scope of this institution has been, is now, and could be in the future – the debate over which important issues should be taken under the WTO umbrella, and, further, which issues are appropriate to send to the Dispute Settlement System. Finally, this article illustrates the challenges facing this dispute settlement system, proposals for reform, and the vital role that the new Advisory Centre may be able to play in resolving some of these challenges. The ceremony for the inauguration of the newly formed Advisory Centre on WTO Law, which will fulfill a vitally needed role for giving assistance to developing countries in their activities in the WTO dispute settlement system, is an appropriate context for me to address some of the broader issues of the WTO, and to situate the beginning of this new Advisory Centre in that broader context." It is my intention to do this task in four major parts. First I will discuss the broader policy ‘ landscape’ in which the trade system is situated today, recognizing that the events of 11 September in New York City and Washington DC are having an extraordinarily profound impact, but not focusing solely on that feature. Secondly, in section 2, I will discuss the WTO as an institution and the importance of the institutional rules, treaty text, and practice for the success of the WTO and other organizations related to it. In this part, I will focus primarily on the nondispute settlement features of the organization, namely the diplomatic and * Correspondence : University Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Centre, 600 New Jersey Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20001, USA. 1 This article is adapted from my keynote lecture delivered at the ceremony for the inauguration of the Advisory Centre on WTO Law, held in Geneva at the WTO, on 5 October 2001. The talk was delivered from rough notes, and was not recorded, so this article is partially a reconstruction as well as a subsequent editing and abridgement of that talk.
منابع مشابه
Setting the Negotiation Table: The Selection of Institutions for Trade Disputes
This paper examines how interest groups influence the decision to negotiate trade problems at the bilateral level, through adjudication, or in a comprehensive trade round. The institutional venues available for trade negotiations vary in terms of issues, rules, actors, and duration. Interest groups have preferences over the choice of institutional venue because differences in the scope and timi...
متن کاملA Conflict of Institutions: The WTO and EU Agricultural Policy
Europe has long defied GATT/WTO rules on agricultural trade during adjudication of trade disputes, but agreed to major reforms of its agricultural policies in the Uruguay Round. Such variation in liberalization outcomes raises questions about when nations will delegate to international institutions and how EU institutions influence its trade policy. This paper focuses on the policy process to e...
متن کاملInternational Institutions and the Volatility of International Trade
During the past half-century, states have established a large number of international trade institutions, both multilateral and regional in scope. The existing literature emphasizes that these agreements are chiefly designed to liberalize and increase the flow of overseas commerce. Yet such institutions have another function that has been largely ignored by researchers, namely, reducing volatil...
متن کاملOverlapping Institutions in Trade Policy
This article examines the effect of overlapping institutions in trade policy, where the World Trade Organization, preferential trade agreements, and other economic negotiation venues give states many options for negotiating rules and settling disputes. This article argues that overlapping institutions influence trade politics at three stages: selection of venue, negotiation of liberalization co...
متن کاملStates Held Hostage: Political Hold-Up Problems and the Effects of International Institutions
This paper argues that the benefits of international institutions accrue disproportionately to pairs of states that find cooperation most difficult. It determines which states achieve the greatest gains from these institutions by identifying a central reason that states fail to cooperate in international relations: they fear being “held up” by other states for political concessions. Political h...
متن کامل