Beyond the Median: Voter Preferences, District Heterogeneity, and Political Representation
نویسندگان
چکیده
Despite the centrality of the median voter prediction in political economy models, overwhelming empirical evidence shows that legislators regularly take positions that diverge significantly from the preferences of the median voter in their districts. However, all these empirical studies to date lack the necessary data to directly measure the preferences of the median voter. We utilize a unique data set consisting of individual-level voting data that allows us to construct direct measures of voter preferences. We find that legislators are most constrained by the preferences of the median voter in homogeneous districts.
منابع مشابه
Beyond the Median: Voter Preferences, District Heterogeneity, and Representation
Empirical studies of the connection between citizen preferences and legislator actions have largely focused on the preferences of a district’s average or median voter. While many theories suggest that preference heterogeneity should also affect this connection, few empirical analyses have rigorously tested claims about the distribution of individual voter preferences. In this paper, we use a un...
متن کاملDivision of the Humanities and Social Sciences California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 91125 Political Confederation
Using a spatial model, we compare different rules for aggregating preferences across confederated districts, under the assumption that voters have private information and face uncertainty about the distribution of preferences of other voters. Our model includes, as special cases, systems of local representation in national assemblies and parliaments and international legislatures with rep rese...
متن کاملEstimating the E¤ect of Direct Democracy on Policy Outcomes: Preferences Matter!
Previous studies have found large negative e¤ects of direct democracies on government spending. Since they do not control for preference heterogeneity, these estimates su¤er from omitted variable bias. If citizens in areas with stronger direct democracy have lower tastes for government, the restraining e¤ect of institutions is overstated. Exploiting a unique dataset in Switzerland, we demonstra...
متن کاملEndogenous Preferences: The Political Consequences of Economic Institutions
This paper attempts to explain cross-national voting behavior in 18 Western democracies over 1960-2003. A new data set for the median voter is introduced that corrects for stochastic error in the statistics from the Comparative Manifesto Project. Next, the paper finds that electoral behavior is closely related to the salience of particular economic institutions. Labour organization, skill speci...
متن کاملEvaluating the Median Voter Model’s Explanatory Power
We match individual senators’ voting behavior on legislative proposals with 24 real referenda decisions on exactly the same issues with identical wording. This setting allows us to evaluate the median voter model’s quality with revealed constituents’ preferences. Results indicate a limited explanatory power of the median voter model: It explains 17.6 percentage points more than random voting an...
متن کامل