Polls, coalitions and strategic voting under proportional representation
نویسنده
چکیده
How do polls influence strategic voting under proportional representation? This paper derives a strategic calculus of voting for coalitions that generates testable predictions about the effects of polls on strategic voting in elections involving four or more parties. Incentives of leftist voters to vote for a centrist over a noncentrist party are shown to increase with the difference in expected seats between the prospective right-wing and left-wing coalitions (and vice versa for rightist voters). Centrist voters’ incentives to vote for a center-left vs a center-right party are also shown to depend on the relative strengths of the right-wing and left-wing coalitions. Importantly, the strategic voting incentives studied here do not depend on the presence of electoral thresholds or other features of the electoral system. The predictions are tested with survey data from parliamentary elections in Austria and Germany.
منابع مشابه
Expectations about Coalitions and Strategic Voting under Proportional Representation
In this paper, I suggest that voters may act strategically in proportional representation elections with post-election coalition building. Based on a stylized setup involving three possible coalitions of four parties on a single policy dimension, voters whose preferred coalition is least likely to win are predicted to strategically cast their ballot for a centrist party. By contrast, those who ...
متن کاملDo Polls InBuence the Vote?
PO L L S P ROV I D E I N F O R M AT I O N A B O U T how well the parties are doing in a campaign. That information may affect voters’ perceptions of the various parties’ chances of winning in a Arst past the post (FPP) system such as Canada or the chances of being part of a coalition government in a proportional representation (PR) system. By affecting voters’ expectations about the outcome of ...
متن کاملRepresenting the Insincere: Strategically Robust Proportional Representation
Proportional representation (PR) is a fundamental principle of many democracies world-wide which employ PR-based voting rules to elect their representatives. e normative properties of these voting rules however, are oen only understood in the context of sincere voting. In this paper we consider PR in the presence of strategic voters. We construct a voting rule such that for every preference p...
متن کاملParty Formation and Policy Outcomes under Di ff erent Electoral Systems ∗
I introduce a simple model of representative democracy that allows for strategic parties, strategic candidates, strategic voters, and multiple districts. If the distribution of policy preferences is not too heterogeneous across and within districts, then the number of effective parties is larger under Proportional Representation than under Plurality Voting, confirming Duverger’s hypothesis, and...
متن کاملPolicy Stability under Di erent Electoral
This paper looks at the stability of policy outcomes under di erent electoral systems. The political game among parties and party supporters of di erent ideologies involves pre-election coalition formation as well as after-election parliamentary bargaining. Voters' preferences vary across districts and over time. We show that under proportional representation there exists a unique stable policy...
متن کامل