Friedman ’ s Monetary Framework : Some Lessons
نویسنده
چکیده
t is an honor and a pleasure to have this opportunity, on the anniversary of Milton and Rose Friedman's popular classic, Free to Choose, to speak on Milton Friedman's monetary framework and his contributions to the theory and practice of monetary policy. About a year ago, I also had the honor, at a conference at the University of Chicago in honor of Milton's ninetieth birthday, to discuss the contribution of Friedman's classic 1963 work with Anna Schwartz, A Monetary History of the United States. 1 I mention this earlier talk not only to indicate that I am ready and willing to praise Friedman's contributions wherever and whenever anyone will give me a venue but also because of the critical influence of A Monetary History on both Friedman's own thought and on the views of a generation of monetary policymakers. In their Monetary History, Friedman and Schwartz reviewed nearly a century of American monetary experience in painstaking detail, providing an historical analysis that demonstrated the importance of monetary forces in the economy far more convincingly than any purely theoretical or even economet-ric analysis could ever do. Friedman's close attention to the lessons of history for economic policy is an aspect of his approach to economics that I greatly admire. Milton has never been a big fan of government licensing of professionals , but maybe he would make an exception in the case of monetary policy-makers. With an appropriately designed licensing examination, focused heavily on the fine details of the Monetary History, perhaps we could ensure that policy-makers had at least some of the appreciation of the lessons of history that always informed Milton Friedman's views on monetary policy. Today I will pass over Friedman's contributions to our knowledge of monetary history and focus instead on how his ideas have influenced our understanding both of how monetary policy works and how it should be used. That is, I will discuss both the positive and the normative implications of Friedman's
منابع مشابه
A Private Central Bank: Some Olde English Lessons
ISSATISFACTION with persistent and volatile inflation since the mid-1960s has led to numem’ous calls for a different approach to monetary policy. In some cases, people have suggested that monetary policy decisions be made more explicitly political, for example, subject to greater control by Congress via congressionally mandated monetary growth targets. In the same vein, Milton Friedman has prop...
متن کاملآزمون فرضیه بیثباتی پول فریدمن در ایران: رویکردی نامتقارن از مدل بسط یافته VARMA, GARCH-M
Money supply and velocity of money are important variables that affect inflation and product. Velocity of money is a key concept for economic policy, and it's getting more important since it is closely related to behavior of the demand for money. In this regard, Friedman believes that the volatility of money growth is the main factor of velocity of money, which in monetary economics literature ...
متن کاملFROM MONETARY TARGETING TO INFLATION TARGETING: LESSONS FROM THE INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES by
The paper looks at the evolution of monetary policy in industrialized countries by evaluating two monetary policy strategies, monetary targeting and inflation targeting. The paper provides brief case studies of countries that have adopted these two strategies and draws a set of lessons. The experience with monetary targeting suggests that although it was successful in controlling inflation in S...
متن کاملLiquidity, Credit Frictions, and Optimal Monetary Policy
We study optimal monetary policy in a NewMonetarist framework with banking, private liquidity, and credit frictions.We show that whenever part of the decentralized transactions are allowed to use deposit claims backed by interest-bearing assets, the optimal policy is a non-Friedman-rule liquidity trap. In contrast, the Friedman rule is optimal if there are no credit frictions, or if the economy...
متن کاملFriedman and Schwartz ’ s Monetary Explanation of the Great Depression : Old Challenges and New Evidence
For many, Friedman and Schwartz’s Monetary History of the United States (1963) is synonymous with the notion that monetary contraction and errors by the Federal Reserve caused the Great Depression. Though that is one of the book’s conclusions, this quick summary both sells the book short in important ways and oversells its findings about the 1930s. The crucial way it sells the book short is tha...
متن کامل