Permutation versus Bootstrap Significance Tests in Multiple Regression and Anova
نویسنده
چکیده
Kempthorne's (1952) formulation of the randomization test is extended to yield a permutational analog of the bootstrap significance test. In the new test, residuals of a multiple regression are permuted instead of being bootstrapped. The test is an attractive alternative for Oja's test that permutes predictors (Austr. J.
منابع مشابه
Inference for Health Econometrics: Inference, Model Tests, Diagnostics, Multiple Tests, and Bootstrap
This paper presents a brief summary of classical statistical inference for many commonly-used regression model estimators that are asymptotically normally distributed. The paper covers Wald con dence intervals and hypothesis tests based on robust standard errors; tests of model adequacy and model diagnostics; family-wise error rates and false discovery rates that control for multiple testing; a...
متن کاملAnova for Longitudinal Data with Missing Values
We carry out an ANOVA analysis to compare multiple treatment effects for longitudinal studies with missing values. The treatment effects are modeled semiparametrically via a partially linear regression which is flexible in quantifying the time effects of treatments. The empirical likelihood is employed to formulate nonparametric ANOVA tests for treatment effects with respect to covariates and t...
متن کاملEfficient calculation of p-values in linear-statistic permutation significance tests
Resampling significance tests possess a number of desirable properties: they are conceptually simple, unbiased, powerful and free of assumptions about the parent populations involved. There exists a huge literature in this area, including canonical works by Fisher [1], Pitman [2], Efron [3], Edgington [4], Davison and Hinkley [5] and Good [6]. Unfortunately, even if we restrict ourselves to the...
متن کاملA simulation study of permutation, bootstrap, and gene dropping for assessing statistical significance in the case of unequal relatedness.
We used simulations to evaluate methods for assessing statistical significance in association studies. When the statistical model appropriately accounted for relatedness among individuals, unrestricted permutation tests and a few other simulation-based methods effectively controlled type I error rates; otherwise, only gene dropping controlled type I error but at the expense of statistical power.
متن کاملA Wild Bootstrap for Degenerate Kernel Tests
A wild bootstrap method for nonparametric hypothesis tests based on kernel distribution embeddings is proposed. This bootstrap method is used to construct provably consistent tests that apply to random processes, for which the naive permutation-based bootstrap fails. It applies to a large group of kernel tests based on V-statistics, which are degenerate under the null hypothesis, and nondegener...
متن کامل