A list of highly influential biomedical researchers, 1996-2011.
نویسندگان
چکیده
We have generated a list of highly influential biomedical researchers based on Scopus citation data from the period 1996-2011. Of the 15,153,100 author identifiers in Scopus, approximately 1% (n=149,655) have an h-index >=20. Of those, we selected 532 authors who belonged to the 400 with highest total citation count (>=25,142 citations) and/or the 400 with highest h-index (>=76). Of those, we selected the top-400 living core biomedical researchers based on a normalized score combining total citations and h-index. Another 62 authors whose focus is outside biomedicine had a normalized score that was at least as high as the score of the 400th core biomedical researcher. We provide information on the profile of these most influential authors, including the most common Medical Subject Heading terms in their articles that are also specific to their work, most common journals where they publish, number of papers with over 100 citations that they have published as first/single, last, or middle authors, and impact score adjusted for authorship positions, given that crude citation indices and authorship positions are almost totally orthogonal. We also show for each researcher the distribution of their papers across 4 main levels (basic-to-applied) of research. We discuss technical issues, limitations and caveats, comparisons against other lists of highly-cited researchers, and potential uses of this resource.
منابع مشابه
ضرورت نگارش مقالات علمی با ارزشتر در حوزه سلامت
سخن سردبیر Editorial مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان دوره 13، اسفند 1393، 1104-1103 ضرورت نگارش مقالات علمی با ارزشتر در حوزه سلامت The Necessity of Writing More Valuable Articles in Health Domain محسن رضائیان[1] M. Rezaeian شواهد و مدارک موجود نشان میدهند که تعداد مقالات منتشر شده در حوزه سلامت به سرعت فزایندهای در حال رشد می...
متن کاملVocabulary Lists for EAP and Conversation Students
Despite the abundance of research investigating general and academic vocabularies and developing dozens of word lists, few studies have compared academic vocabulary with general service word lists such as conversation vocabulary. Many EAP researchers assume that university students need to know all the words in West’s (1953) General Service List (GSL) as a prerequisite to academic words (e.g., ...
متن کاملMedical Informatics Research at Georgia Tech : an Overview
The overall objective of this paper is to describe ongoing research programs in the Medical Informatics Laboratory in the Bioengineering Center of the Georgia Institute of Technology. Current research projects are highly interdisciplinary, spanning such areas as computer vision and image processing, arti cial intelligence, and computer graphics and visualization. In general, the emphasis of the...
متن کاملGuest Editorial: Big Scholar Data Discovery and Collaboration
THE last part of the special issue includes two papers—an interesting empirical study using the very large scholarly dataset described in the solicitation of this special issue, and a survey paper serving as an outlook of the field. In the paper “The Habits of Highly Effective Researchers: An Empirical Study” by Datta, Basuchowdhuri, Acharya and Majumder, the authors attempted to discern some c...
متن کاملIs more always better
Is more always better? We address this question in the context of bibliometric indices that aim to assess the scientific impact of individual researchers by counting their number of highly cited publications. We propose a simple model in which the number of citations of a publication depends not only on the scientific impact of the publication but also on other ‘random’ factors. Our model indic...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- European journal of clinical investigation
دوره 43 12 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013