Lower Pole Renal Calculi: When and How to Treat
نویسندگان
چکیده
This article addresses the respective roles of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), ureteroscopy (URS), open surgery and laparoscopy as they pertain to the management of lower pole calculi, an area of ongoing controversy. Lower pole stones that are symptomatic, locally obstructing, infection related, or increasing in size require intervention. Smaller, asymptomatic stones can be managed expectantly, though with periodic followup a significant number will exhibit increasing size or become symptomatic. For most stones smaller than 1 cm, SWL is the treatment of choice while for stones greater than 2 cm, percutaneous management is generally indicated. Stones in the range of 1 2 cm represent an area of ongoing controversy regarding respective roles of SWL, PCNL and ureteroscopy. In such cases, consideration should also be given to intrarenal anatomy and stone fragility in determining appropriate therapeutic intervention.
منابع مشابه
بررسی میزان موفقیت جراحی پرکوتانئوس در درمان سنگ کلیه بیماران مبتلا به ناهنجاریهای مادرزادی کلیوی
Background & Aim: Patients with congenital renal abnormality are more prone to calculus formation and have less chance of spontaneous stone passage. Percutaneous treatment of patients with calculi in an abnormal kidney can be challenging due to the altered anatomical relationship in the retroperitoneum. Therefore, we performed a review to assess the safety and efficacy of this minimally inv...
متن کاملOpinion: Do not treat
The increasing use of cross-sectional imaging has made the incidental detection of asymptomatic stones a common occurrence with an estimated 8% of the population affected (1). Despite its frequency the average asymptomatic stone size is only 3 mm and is frequently located in the lower pole (1, 2). Nevertheless, urologists are often faced with the decision to treat or not to treat these asymptom...
متن کاملCost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi.
UNLABELLED What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Stone management economics is a complex issue. FURS and SWL are recognised treatment option for lower pole kidney stones. There are paucity of data comparing cost implication and effectiveness of both treatment options. Both treatment modalities are equally efficacious. FURS incurred greater cost burden compared to SWL in the ...
متن کاملEfficacy and cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary lower pole renal calculi.
PURPOSE We determined the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy and compared its cost-effectiveness with percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the management of lower pole renal calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS The efficacy (stone-free rates at 3-months posttreatment) of shock wave lithotripsy with the modified Dornier HM3* machine was determined retrospectively in 114 patien...
متن کاملStone-Free-Rate After Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in the Management of Pediatric Renal Stones in Lower Pole and Other Locations - A Comparative Study.
OBJECTIVE To determine a difference in the stone-free-rate among different renal locations in children after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL). STUDY DESIGN A descriptive study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY Urology Department, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan, from January 2007 to June 2015. METHODOLOGY The study included children who underwent ESWL, divided into...
متن کامل