Endorsing Obama licenses favoring Whites

نویسندگان

  • Daniel A. Effron
  • Jessica S. Cameron
  • Benoît Monin
چکیده

Three studies tested whether the opportunity to endorse Barack Obama made individuals subsequently more likely to favor Whites over Blacks. In Study 1, participants were more willing to describe a job as better suited for Whites than for Blacks after expressing support for Obama. Study 2 replicated this effect and ruled out alternative explanations: participants favored Whites for the job after endorsing Obama, but not after endorsing a White Democrat, nor after seeing Obama’s photo without having an opportunity to endorse him. Study 3 demonstrated that racial attitudes moderated this effect: endorsing Obama increased the amount of money allocated to an organization serving Whites at the expense of an organization serving Blacks only for participants high in a measure of racial prejudice. These three studies suggest that expressing support for Obama grants people moral credentials [Monin, B., & Miller, D. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 33–43], thus reducing their concern with appearing prejudiced. 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. For the first time in American history, voters in 2008 had the Study 1 opportunity to vote for an African–American presidential nominee from amajor political party. Many voters probably felt that endorsing Barack Obama demonstrated not only their political values, but also their lack of racial prejudice. Ironically, establishing oneself psychologically as unprejudiced may make people feel more comfortable expressing views that could be interpreted as prejudiced. Contemporary Americans are normally careful not to express such views for fear of experiencing disapproval or guilt (Crandall & Eshleman, 2003), unless their past behavior establishes their moral credentials as unbiased individuals: Monin and Miller (2001) showed that merely choosing an African–American – who was the most qualified applicant – for a hypothetical job increased the likelihood that participants would describe a subsequent job as being better suited for White applicants. Consistent with these findings, we propose that endorsing Obama can license people to favor Whites at the expense of Blacks. We conducted three studies to test this proposition. Study 1 tests whether letting participants endorse Obama increases their willingness to favor a White job applicant. Study 2 seeks to replicate this effect and rule out two alternative explanations. Study 3 examines whether people high in racial prejudice are especially likely to favor Whites in a budget allocation task after endorsing Obama. ll rights reserved. Method

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Running head: ENDORSING OBAMA LICENSES FAVORING WHITES Endorsing Obama Licenses Favoring Whites

Three studies tested whether the opportunity to endorse Barack Obama made individuals subsequently more likely to favor Whites over Blacks. In Study 1, participants were more willing to describe a job as better suited for Whites than for Blacks after expressing support for Obama. Study 2 replicated this effect and ruled out alternative explanations: participants favored Whites for the job after...

متن کامل

STATE OF THE ART A BLACK MAN IN THE WHITE HOUSE? The Role of Racism and Patriotism in the 2008 Presidential Election1

Race and patriotism were recurring themes during the 2008 presidential campaign that were used to highlight differences between Barack Obama and his opponents. Yet we know little about how racism and patriotism ultimately affected support for Obama among Whites. Appeals to working-class Whites, a lot of which were thinly veiled allusions to Obama’s race and perceived lack of patriotism, also fi...

متن کامل

Color blindness and interracial interaction: playing the political correctness game.

Two experiments explored the ramifications of endorsing color blindness as a strategy for appearing unprejudiced. In Study 1, Whites proved adept at categorizing faces on the basis of race, but understated their ability to do so. In Study 2, Whites playing the Political Correctness Game--a matching task that requires describing other individuals--were less likely to use race as a descriptor whe...

متن کامل

The effect of Obama saliency on individual-level racial bias: Silver bullet or smokescreen?

a r t i c l e i n f o President Obama's election has been construed as a potentially positive force for intergroup relations, but this issue has not been previously addressed experimentally. In experiment 1, conducted 4–5 months after the election, White participants were primed with either President Obama or nature before completing a variety of race-related measures. Results indicated that pr...

متن کامل

Race-ethnic differences in patent foramen ovale, atrial septal aneurysm, and right atrial anatomy among ischemic stroke patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Stroke remains a substantial cause of mortality and morbidity in the United States. Racial differences in stroke incidence and mortality persist with well-known excesses among blacks. Information on stroke among Hispanics is limited. In particular, little is known about whether patent foramen ovale (PFO), atrial septal aneurysm (ASA), and other atrial anomalies associated...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009