Punishment and counter-punishment in public good games: Can we really govern ourselves?
نویسنده
چکیده
A number of experimental studies have shown that the opportunity to punish anti-social behavior increases cooperation levels when agents face a social dilemma. Using a public good experiment, I show that in the presence of counter-punishment opportunities cooperators are less willing to punish free riders. As a result, cooperation breaks down and groups have lower earnings in comparison to a treatment without punishments where free riding is predominant. Approximately one quarter of all punishments are retaliated. Counter-punishments appear to be driven partly by strategic considerations and partly by a desire to reciprocate punishments. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. JEL classification: C92; D70; H41
منابع مشابه
How Robust is Peer Punishment for Promoting Efficient Cooperation? Evidence from Nonlinear Environments*
Most social dilemma and public goods provision problems exhibit nonlinearities that lead to equilibrium outcomes in the interior of the choice space. Yet this environment has been ignored in most experimental studies of peer punishment. This paper examines the effectiveness of peer punishment in promoting socially efficient behavior in such nonlinear environments. We report results from a labor...
متن کاملI Dare You to Punish Me—Vendettas in Games of Cooperation
Everybody has heard of neighbours, who have been fighting over some minor topic for years. The fight goes back and forth, giving the neighbours a hard time. These kind of reciprocal punishments are known as vendettas and they are a cross-cultural phenomenon. In evolutionary biology, punishment is seen as a mechanism for maintaining cooperative behaviour. However, this notion of punishment exclu...
متن کاملA comparison of punishment rules in repeated public good games: An experimental study
In this experimental study we analyse three collective and one individual punishment rule in a public good setting. We show that under all punishment rules cooperation is stronger and more sustainable than reported from settings without punishment. Moreover, we present evidence and explanations for differences between the rules concerning punishment intensity, contribution and profit levels, as...
متن کاملWhen Do Punishment Institutions Work?
While peer punishment sometimes motivates increased cooperation, it sometimes reduces cooperation. We use a lab experiment to study why punishment sometimes fails. We begin with a gift exchange game with punishment as it has typically been implemented therein since punishment has often backfired in this game. We modify two features of punishment that could increase its efficacy: punishment’s st...
متن کاملImperfect public monitoring with costly punishment - An experimental study∗
This paper experimentally investigates the effects of a costly punishment option on cooperation and social welfare in long, finitely repeated public good contribution games. In a perfect monitoring environment, increasing the severity of the potential punishment monotonically increases both contributions and the average net payoffs of subjects. In a more realistic imperfect monitoring environme...
متن کامل