Donor and Recipient Factors Affecting an Embryo Transfer Program

A commercially viable cattle embryo transfer (ET) industry was established during the early 1970s. Initially, techniques for recovering and transferring cattle embryos were exclusively surgical. However, by the late 1970s, most embryos were recovered and transferred nonsurgically. Successful cryopreservation of embryos was widespread by the early 1980s, followed by the introduction of embryo splitting, in vitro procedures, direct transfer of frozen embryos and sexing of embryos. The wide spread adoption of ethylene glycol as a cryoprotectant has simplified the thaw-transfer procedures for frozen embryos. The number of embryos recovered annually has not grown appreciably over the last 10 years in North America and Europe; however, there has been significant growth of commercial ET in South America, especially Brazil. Although a number of new technologies have been adopted within the ET industry in the last decade, the basic procedure of superovulation of donor cattle has undergone little improvement over the last 20 years. The effects of a large number of factors on the pregnancy rates of fresh and frozen cattle embryos were examined over a period of years at several different locations. For fresh embryos, overall pregnancy rates were 68.3% (n=9023) and 77.1% (n=2650) at different locations and time periods. Frozen-thawed embryo pregnancy rates were 56.1% (n=3616) in The Netherlands and 58.4% (n=5297) and 68.7% (n=774) for two studies in the United States. Pregnancy rates of surgical versus nonsurgical transfers were very similar. There were no differences in the pregnancy rates of beef versus dairy embryos, but the pregnancy rate was greater in dairy and beef heifers and beef cows than in dairy cows. Estrous asynchrony between plus and minus 24 h did not affect pregnancy rate for frozen-thawed or fresh embryos. Neither breed nor parity of recipients affected the influence of asynchrony on pregnancy rates. Embryo grade was a significant factor in pregnancy rate for both fresh and frozen-thawed embryos, but neither embryo stage nor age was a significant factor. Pregnancy rate was not affected by holding embryos after flushing for up to 3 h prior to freezing. Therefore, there are numerous potential donor and recipient factors that may alter pregnancy rates for an embryo transfer program. This review will focus on these factors.