Towards structural systematicity in distributed, statically bound visual representations
نویسندگان
چکیده
The problem of representing the spatial structure of images, which arises in visual object processing, is commonly described using terminology borrowed from propositional theories of cognition, notably, the concept of compositionality. The classical propositional stance mandates representations composed of symbols, which stand for atomic or composite entities and enter into arbitrarily nested relationships. We argue that the main desiderata of a representational system—productivity and systematicity—can (indeed, for a number of reasons, should) be achieved without recourse to the classical, proposition-like compositionality. We show how this can be done, by describing a systematic and productive model of the representation of visual structure, which relies on static rather than dynamic binding and uses coarsely coded rather than atomic shape primitives. © 2002 Cognitive Science Society, Inc. All rights reserved.
منابع مشابه
Commonalities between Perception and Cognition
Perception and cognition are highly interrelated. Given the influence that these systems exert on one another, it is important to explain how perceptual representations and cognitive representations interact. In this paper, I analyze the similarities between visual perceptual representations and cognitive representations in terms of their structural properties and content. Specifically, I argue...
متن کاملRobust Semantic Systematicity and Distributed Representations in a Connectionist Model of Sentence Comprehension
There is considerable debate about the amount and kind of systematicity displayed by neural networks. One important requirement is that the systematicity is robust and not overly dependent on specific parameter settings and training details. We present a recurrent neural network model of sentence comprehension that realizes robust semantic systematicity on the basis of distributed representations.
متن کاملConnectionism and the Problem of Systematicity
Systematicity is a pervasive property of cognitive behaviour (e.g., language and reasoning) whereby the ability to represent (systematicity of representation) and infer from (systematicity of inference) some instances of a structured object extends to other instances conforming to the same structure (Fodor & Pylyshyn, 1988; Fodor & McLaughlin, 1990). The problem of systematicity for a Connectio...
متن کاملAre Feedforward and Recurrent Networks Systematic? Analysis and Implications for a Connectionist Cognitive Architecture
Human cognition is said to be systematic: cognitive ability generalizes to structurally related behaviours. The connectionist approach to cognitive theorizing has been strongly criticized for its failure to explain systematicity. Demonstrations of generalization notwithstanding, I show that two widely used networks (feedforward and recurrent) do not support systematicity under the condition of ...
متن کامل"Effective systematicity" in, "effective systematicity" out: a reply to Edelman and Intrator (2003)
Letter to the Editor " Effective systematicity " in, " effective systematicity " out: a reply to Edelman and Intrator (2003) Edelman and Intrator (2003) claim that their " what + where " representation is effectively systematic, which is meant to imply that the CoF model overcomes the inability of view-based models to account for the human capacity to represent and process spatial relations—a l...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Cognitive Science
دوره 27 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003