Biomechanical study of rod stress after pedicle subtraction osteotomy versus anterior column reconstruction: A finite element study

BACKGROUND In an effort to minimize rod fractures and nonunion in pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) constructs, surgeons have adopted multirod constructs and interbody cages. Anterior column realignment (ACR) with posterior column osteotomies is a minimally invasive alternative to PSO in sagittal balance correction, however, there is a paucity of evidence with respect to rod survival. METHODS Three-dimensional (3D) finite-element-model of a T12-sacrum spine segment was used to compare a 25° PSO at L3 and an ACR with a posterior column osteotomy and 30° hyperlordotic interbody cage at L3-4. The amount of overall T12-S1 lordosis correction was the same for each condition. Each simulation included cobalt chromium alloy primary rods with: (1) PSO; (2) PSO with an interbody cage (IB) at L2-3 (PSO+IB); (3) PSO with accessory (A) rods and IB at L2-3 (PSO+IB+A); (4) PSO with satellite (S) rods and IB at L2-3 (PSO+IB+2S); (5) ACR; 6) ACR with satellite rods (ACR + 2S). A 400 N follower preload was simulated for each condition. RESULTS PSO condition had the largest rod stress of 286 MPa in flexion. Adding interbody support reduced the rod stress by 15%. The 4-rod constructs further reduced rod stress, with the satellite rod condition facilitating the largest reduction. The rod stress in the ACR+2S was equivalent to the PSO+2S, with 50% reduction in rod stress. CONCLUSION The rod stress with an ACR was comparable to a PSO coupled with interbody support. These results suggest an ACR is a viable MIS alternative to a PSO without the need for a large posterior osteotomy.