Americans with disabilities act: recent and pending u.s. Supreme court decisions and implications for spine professionals.
نویسندگان
چکیده
This article highlights recent and pending United States Supreme Court cases interpreting employment provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act and discusses their implications for spine professionals. The implications include how Spine readers approach evaluations of employees and job applicants with disabilities and workplace accommodations in light of the recent decisions. The cases pending before the Supreme Court involve orthopedic impairments and the "reasonableness" of certain workplace accommodations. Increasingly, spine professionals will be called on to assist in the analysis of these issues. This article will familiarize Spine readers with the legal interpretations under the Americans with Disabilities Act of "disability," "mitigating measures," "qualified individual," and "reasonable accommodations." It illustrates the ways in which spine professionals may be called on to help interpret and apply qualification and safety standards under the Americans with Disabilities Act to assist individuals, employers, attorneys, and other stakeholders in the employment of people with disabilities.
منابع مشابه
An update on the Americans with Disabilities Act: implications for health and human services delivery.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was signed into law nearly a decade ago. The ADA is designed to protect persons with disabilities from discrimination in nearly every aspect of American life. This article focuses on a number of recent court rulings that help to clarify important components of the ADA. It is critical for health and human services professionals to be aware of these recen...
متن کاملAn oncology perspective on the Supreme Court's pending decision regarding the Affordable Care Act.
Beginning on March 26, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments regarding challenges to the recent federal health care reform legislation. The Court scheduled this unusually lengthy series of arguments to last for three days—a reflection of both the high stakes and the complexity of the legal issues involved. Whatever the Court ultimately decides, the outcome will have ...
متن کاملDefeating discrimination. A new law protects people with diabetes in the workplace and beyond.
John Steigauf waS fighting a losing battle with type 2 diabetes. Diet, exercise, and medication: none of it was working, he felt exhausted all the time, and friends said he no longer looked like himself. Still, Steigauf put off what he really needed—insulin injections— for fear he would lose his job. when Steigauf, then 47, finally went on insulin in 2004, his health improved but his fear prove...
متن کاملDrive for Insurance Coverage of Infertility Treatment Raises Questins of Equity, Cost
In 1998, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that individuals suffering from a disability related to their reproductive capacity are protected from discrimination under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Advocates for individuals and couples suffering from infertility are seeking to use this decision as leverage in their long-standing attempts to alter how infertility is viewed and add...
متن کاملAmericans with Disabilities Act: physician-shareholder practice groups and ADA compliance.
This article examines the application of Americans with Disabilities Act requirements to professional associations like physician practice groups. In general, employers with 15 or more full-time employees must comply with the Act. However, the definition of an employee is sometimes unclear, especially as applied to business entities commonly used by physician practice groups. A recent case deci...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Spine
دوره 27 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002