When Liberal Became a Dirty Word 1 1984 : When Liberal Became a Dirty Word
نویسنده
چکیده
For over a hundred years, the Republican Party used the word “liberal” positively in its platforms and proudly wore the liberal mantle. That may surprise you, but it is true. The finding comes from analyzing words used in all 40 Republican Party presidential year platforms from the party’s origin in 1856 to its 2012 election campaign. In contrast, the 44 Democratic Party platforms staunchly—but not consistently—embraced the liberal label since its first real platform in 1840. Concerning “conservative,” neither party mentioned it either frequently or prominently in any of its party platforms. Ordinary citizens may not care much about party platforms and the words they use, but party activists care a lot. The wording of a platform plank often means the difference between victory and defeat to intraparty factions, and new phrasing may foretell new party emphases. Party platforms tell a lot about party politics at the time and over time. For over a hundred years, neither party rephrased “liberal” in any significantly different way, so there was no story to tell about new party emphases. From 1960 to 1980, however, both recast “liberal” into “liberalizing” and “liberalization”—themselves both positive economic terms. Then in 1984, the Republican Party’s rhetoric dramatically and darkly switched, and liberal became a dirty word. The story of how both parties used the term over time is described with frequent illustrations from both parties’ platforms. We begin with the Republican Party in 1860.
منابع مشابه
A Multi-Lingual Dictionary of Dirty Words
We present a multi-lingual dictionary of dirty words. We have collected about 3,200 dirty words in several languages and built a database of these. The language with the most words in the database is English, though there are several hundred dirty words in for instance Japanese too. Words are classified into their general meaning, such as what part of the human anatomy they refer to. Words can ...
متن کاملCitizens’ Perceptions of Ideological Bias in Research on Public Policy Controversies
How do ordinary citizens react to new policy-relevant findings that they learn about from media mentions or word of mouth? We conducted an experiment embedded in a randomdigit-dial (RDD) telephone survey of 1,050 California adults. Respondents heard a description of a hypothetical study on one of four politicized topics or a politically neutral topic (nutrition) and were asked to describe their...
متن کاملE-money Laundering Prevention
Although the word of “Money Laundering” isn’t very old in world literature, but attempted money laundering has a long history a long side with trade and commerce, as it always has been told. Money laundering is a process that the incomes of criminal acts enter to the economic cycle and will purify Dirty income. Therefore, we can say launderers are actually committed two offenses, primarily crim...
متن کاملCrossbreeding: A Dirty Word or an Opportunity?
Historically, genetic improvement programs for dairy cattle focused on within-breed selection strategies due to the strong role of breed associations in developing selection policies and a milk pricing system that rewarded volume rather than cheese yield. As a result, Holsteins became the predominant breed in the US and most other major milk producing nations. However, farmers have become incre...
متن کاملEmerging Waste-to-Energy Technologies: Solid Waste Solution or Dead End?
Incineration is a dirty word in the United States, at least where trash is involved. We’ve been burning municipal solid waste (MSW) since the 1880s. But the dawning of the environmental movement eight decades later cast new light on the nitrous oxides, dioxins, and other chemicals emitted from as many as 600 massburn incinerators nationwide, which meanwhile had also grown in size. 2 The ecologi...
متن کامل