Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography carotid arteries.

نویسندگان

  • Jean U-King-Im
  • Rikin Trivedi
  • Jonnathan H Gillard
چکیده

Angiography Carotid Arteries To the Editor: We were very interested to read the recent study by Johnston et al1 regarding the use of contrast-enhanced MRA (CEMRA) for carotid stenosis. The authors correctly highlight in their introduction the limitations of many current studies of noninvasive tests. We, however, remain to be convinced that their own study is an adequate reflection of the performance of CEMRA in “routine clinical practice.” Up to 55% of MRA studies reported in the literature may include a significant proportion of carotid arteries with minor stenosis.2 These populations may not reflect the true population in which CEMRA would be used. It is thus quite possible that such studies actually tend to overestimate the overall performance of CEMRA compared with routine clinical practice.2 It is difficult to know whether the significant misclassification rate of 24% quoted by Johnston et al may be a reflection of that because the study population is not clearly defined in terms of the percentage of patients with significant disease. Another important point to raise is the fact that there is no mention at all of the number of views in which both catheter angiography (DSA) and CEMRA were reported. DSA is usually acquired in two or four 2D projections while CEMRA is a 3D technique. For CEMRA, most radiologists would either print a series of 12 to 18 MIP projections or choose a limited selection of MIP projections from the workstation to demonstrate the tightest stenosis.3 There is substantial body of evidence in the literature showing that increasing the number of projections can lead to greater severity of stenosis being found due to the occurrence of noncircular lumens.4,5 We therefore firmly believe that any direct comparison between DSA and CEMRA should use exactly the same projections with both techniques. It may be possible that the overestimation found by Johnston et al1 may represent a difference in the number of projections acquired rather than an actual inherent difference between CEMRA and DSA. We agree with the authors that the practice of “selective angiography” in their study population will have introduced significant bias. It seems plausible that the study population quoted would have comprised a much higher proportion of cases where ultrasound or CEMRA would have been equivocal. Even if CEMRA alone is subsequently shown to be good enough to replace DSA, DSA will still be required in such equivocal cases in routine clinical practice. Moreover, there is no mention of whether the official DSA reports were based on actual measurements by radiologists rather than the “eye-balling” technique which may be more widespread than thought. The retrospective nature of the article also suggests that the official DSA reports were done by radiologists who did not know at the time whether their results would be used in a study as opposed to the CEMRA measurements. Despite our reservations, we do agree fully with the authors that some caution is needed before using noninvasive techniques such as CEMRA alone before such techniques are properly validated. The absence of procedural complication does not necessarily make CEMRA safer if significant misclassification of carotid disease is going to occur. The research setting, be it an academic center or a community hospital, should not in itself affect the extrapolation of results to routine clinical practice. Poor methodological criteria will do so.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Comparison of different techniques for non-contrast –enhanced and contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Carotid arteries

Purpose: Since the introduction of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in clinical routine vascular imaging always has been a challenge. Early MR angiography (MRA) techniques were based on intrinsic contrast mechanisms related to blood (non CE techniques). The development of contrast enhanced (CE) MRA techniques using gadolinium based contrast agents (GBCA) substantially changed vascular MR applic...

متن کامل

Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in brain death

Confirmatory tests for the diagnosis of brain death in addition to clinical findings may shorten observation time required in some countries and may add certainty to the diagnosis under specific circumstances. The practicability of Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography to confirm cerebral circulatory arrest was assessed after the diagnosis of brain death in 15 patients using a 1.5 ...

متن کامل

Three-Dimensional Model-Based Stenosis Quantification of the Carotid Arteries from Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography

A model-based technique for quantitative analysis of three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is presented. The model consists of a deformable B-spline representation of the central vessel axis and the vessel wall. An efficient interaction mechanism to initialize the models in a three-dimensional setting is devised. Two novel image features are introduced in order to deform the ce...

متن کامل

High-resolution, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with elliptical centric k-space ordering of supra-aortic arteries compared with selective X-ray angiography.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The objective of this study was to evaluate the relative value of high-resolution, contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE MRA) with elliptical centric k-space ordering compared with intra-arterial x-ray angiography for imaging carotid stenosis. METHODS Thirty patients with suspected stenosis of the carotid arteries were examined with CE MRA (1.5-T scanner) and x-ray angio...

متن کامل

Contrast-enhanced carotid magnetic resonance angiography: comparison of single-dose and double-dose of gadolinium using the randomly segmented central k-space ordering technique.

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the single dose of gadolinium is sufficient for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of carotid arteries with the use of newly developed randomly segmented central k-space ordering technique called contrast-enhanced timing-robust angiography (CENTRA). METHODS A total of 44 patients underwent carotid MRA in a 1.5T MR sc...

متن کامل

Noninvasive detection of steno-occlusive disease of the supra-aortic arteries with three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: a prospective, intra-individual comparative analysis with digital subtraction angiography.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Concomitant disease of the supra-aortic arteries can influence the outcome of surgical treatment of carotid artery stenosis. However, sensitivity and specificity data of noninvasive contrast-enhanced 3-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA) for the detection of steno-occlusive disease of the entire supra-aortic arteries including the circle of Willis rem...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Stroke

دوره 34 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003