Popper and systematics.

BAUM, B. R. 1992. Combining trees as a way of combining data sets for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees. Taxon 41:3–10. BAUM, B. R., AND M. A. RAGAN. 1993. Reply to A. G. Rodrigo’s ‘A comment on Baum’s method for combining trees.’ Taxon 42:637–640. BININDA-EMONDS, O. R. P., AND H. N. BRYANT. 1998. Properties of matrix representation with parsimony analysis. Syst. Biol. 47:497– 508. BROOKS, D. R. 1990. Parsimony analysis in historical biogeography and coevolution: Methodological and theoretical update. Syst. Zool. 39:14–30. BROOKS, D. R. 1996. Explanations of homoplasy at different levels of biological organization. Pages 3–36 in Homoplasy. The recurrence of similarity in evolution (M. J. Sanderson and L. Hufford, eds.). Academic Press, San Diego. DOYLE, J. J. 1992. Gene trees and species trees: Molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst. Bot. 17:144–163. EBACH, M. C., AND K. J. McNAMARA. 2002. A systematic revision of the family Harpetidae (Trilobita). Rec. West. Aust. Mus. 21:235–267. FARRIS, J. S. 1973. On comparing the shapes of taxonomic trees. Syst. Zool. 22:50–54. FARRIS, J. S., A. G. KLUGE, AND M. J. ECKHARDT. 1970. A numerical approach to phylogenetic systematics. Syst. Zool. 19:172–191. GUIGÓ, R., I. MUCHNIK, AND T. F. SMITH. 1996. Reconstruction of ancient molecular phylogeny. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 6:189–213. HUGOT, J.-P., AND J.-F. COSSON. 2000. Constructing general area cladograms by matrix representation with parsimony: A western Palearctic example. Belg. J. Entomol. 2:77–86. KLUGE, A. G. 1993. Three-taxon transformation in phylogenetic inference: Ambiguity and distortion as regards explanatory power. Cladistics 9:246–259. NELSON, G. J. 1979. Cladistic analysis and synthesis: Principles and definitions with a historical note on Adanson’s “Familles des Plantes” (1763–1764). Syst. Zool. 28:1–21. NELSON, G. J. 1993. Reply. Cladistics 9:261–265. NELSON, G. J. 1996. Nullius in Verba. J. Comp. Biol. 1:141–152. NELSON, G. J., AND P. Y. LADIGES. 1991a. Standard assumptions for biogeographic analysis. Austr. Syst. Bot. 4:41–58. NELSON, G. J., AND P. Y. LADIGES. 1991b. Three-area statements: Standard assumptions for biogeographic analysis. Syst. Zool. 40:470–485. NELSON, G. J., AND P. Y. LADIGES. 1992a. Information content and fractional weight of three-taxon statements. Syst. Biol. 41:490–494. NELSON, G. J., AND P. Y. LADIGES. 1992b. TAX: MSDOS program for cladistics. American Museum of Natural History, New York. NELSON, G. J., AND P. Y. LADIGES. 1994. Three-item consensus: Empirical test of fractional weighting. Pages 193–209 in Models in phylogeny reconstruction (R. W. Scotland, D. J. Siebert, and