The role of discourse context in determining the argument structure of novel verbs with omitted arguments

نویسندگان

  • Theeraporn Ratitamkul
  • Adele E. Goldberg
  • Cynthia Fisher
چکیده

Introduction The interpretation of verb meaning hinges in large part on the argument structure of the verb. In a series of experiments, young children have been found to use the number and type of arguments that appear with a verb in order to determine its meaning (e.g., Fisher 1996, 2002; Goldberg 2004; Landau & Gleitman 1985; Lidz, Gleitman & Gleitman 2003; Naigles 1990). For example, when hearing the novel verb blick in “She’s blicking her”, a child is likely to conclude that the verb refers to an act with two participants, one acting on the other, more often than when hearing the verb in “She’s blicking”. A verb’s subcategorization frame is thus a significant cue in the acquisition of verb meaning. However, languages vary with respect to how and when surface arguments are realized. There is a clear motivation from conversational pragmatics for leaving recoverable arguments unsaid, as expressed in Horn’s (1984a) R Principle or Grice’s (1967) Maxim of Quantity: say no more than you must. There is no need to utter arguments that are recoverable in the discourse context. As might be expected, then, many languages, perhaps the majority of languages in the world, routinely allow recoverable arguments, both subjects and objects, to be omitted. These languages include, for example, Hindi, Hungarian, Japanese, Korean, Laos, Russian, and Thai. Typical dialogues from Russian are shown in (1), Korean in (2) and Thai in (3):

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

L1 Transfer in L2 Acquisition of the There-Insertion Construction by Mandarin EFL Learners

This study examined the role of the native language (L1) transfer in a non-native language (L2) acquisition of the there-insertion construction at the syntax-semantics interface. Specifically, the study investigated if Mandarin EFL learners would make overgeneralization errors in the situation where an L1 argument structure constitutes a superset of its L2 counterpart. Verbs of existence and ap...

متن کامل

The Role of Conceptualizable Agent in Overpassivization of English Unaccusatives in Iranian English Majors

The present study is an attempt to explore the effect of one of the pragmatic elements of discourse (namely the conceptualizable agent) on overpassivization of English unaccusative verbs. Through employing the questionnaire originally used by Ju, (2000), 206 Iranian intermediate and advanced English majors were asked to choose the more grammatical form (active or passive) in target sentences wi...

متن کامل

The Discourse Basis of Constructions: Some Evidence from Korean Acquisition

1. Introduction The " return of constructions " to linguistic theory has introduced a new approach for analyzing argument structure and its acquisition (Tomasello, 1998). In this approach (Goldberg, 1995), argument structure is conceptualized as involving clause-level semantic-syntactic templates: A construction accommodates verbs of a particular semantic type taking arguments that bear certain...

متن کامل

Commodified Discourses, Commodifying Discourses: In Pursuit of a Theoretical Model on the Constitutive Functioning of Academic Discourse in Marketization of Higher Education

Inspired by Fairclough's suggestion of the idea of commodification in higher education, particularly in terms of "the marketization of the discursive practices of universities" (1993, p. 143), the author of the present paper proposes a theoretical basis within which the constitutive functioning of academic discourse in the mentioned process can be understood.  In this attempt, Althusser's chain...

متن کامل

Developing a Semantic Similarity Judgment Test for Persian Action Verbs and Non-action Nouns in Patients With Brain Injury and Determining its Content Validity

Objective: Brain trauma evidences suggest that the two grammatical categories of noun and verb are processed in different regions of the brain due to differences in the complexity of grammatical and semantic information processing. Studies have shown that the verbs belonging to different semantic categories lead to neural activity in different areas of the brain, and action verb processing is r...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005