Cognitive Biases, Ambiguity Aversion and Asset Pricing in Financial Markets∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
The behavior of agents in financial markets often displays biases or errors; for example, agents frequently do not compute probabilities correctly. However, we argue that these biases/errors are not always reflected in prices. In particular, we hypothesize that agents who make errors in computing probabilities lose confidence in their probability estimates when they face market prices that are inconsistent with their calculations; they then perceive (relevant) uncertain events as ambiguous (rather than risky), and hedge against this perceived ambiguity by holding a portfolio that generates unambiguous returns. These agents are price insensitive – they do not adjust their portfolio with changes in prices – and do not (directly) influence market prices. We identify price insensitive agents in an asset market experiment, and we test implications of our hypothesis: (i) agents who do not update correctly hold more balanced portfolios; (ii) the difference between portfolio holdings of agents who do not update correctly and agents who do update correctly increases as aggregate risk in the economy increases; (iii) prices are determined by the behavior of agents who do update correctly. Our experiments confirm all these hypotheses, but the extent to which observed prices conform to theoretical predictions decreases as the number of agents who do not update correctly increases. These observations reinforce our view that market prices trigger behavior that is consistent with ambiguity aversion. JEL Classification: G11, G12, G14
منابع مشابه
Ambiguity in Asset Markets: Theory and Experiment
This paper studies the impact of ambiguity and ambiguity aversion on equilibrium asset prices and portfolio holdings in competitive financial markets. It argues that attitudes toward ambiguity are heterogeneous across the population, just as attitudes toward risk are heterogeneous across the population, but that heterogeneity of attitudes toward ambiguity has different implications than heterog...
متن کاملOptimizing Financial Asset Pricing Using Quantitative Behavioral Bias Measurement
Optimization of pricing financial assets less an emerging discipline that attempts to model the impact of biases that investors in asset prices. This article provides an overview of the theoretical foundations and challenges and offers some solutions in this field. The paper is divided into two parts. In the first part of the paper, an overview of the selected literature is presented on key the...
متن کاملExamination of Equity Premium Puzzle by Consumption Capital Asset Pricing Model with Fuzzy Nested Regimes: Evidence from Iran
The aim of this study is to examine the equity premium puzzle in Iran for the quarterly period of 1993-2016. In this regard, the hybrid bivariate Garch model and also fuzzy dummy variables with consumption capital asset pricing model (C-CAPM) have been used. The results of study show that using C-CAPM within fuzzy dummy variables (CCAPM-F), the relative risk aversion coefficient of investor is ...
متن کاملAmbiguity and Asset Prices: An Experimental Perspective
The violations of expected utility axioms displayed in the Ellsberg paradox have recently been attributed to ambiguity aversion. In this paper, we study the impact of ambiguity aversion on equilibrium asset pricing and portfolio holdings in competitive financial markets. We pay particular attention to potential heterogeneity, because a significant minority usually does not violate expected util...
متن کاملInstability of Financial Markets and Preference Heterogeneity
This paper presents a simple rational expectations model of intertemporal asset pricing relating instability of stock return characteristics to heterogeneity in investor preferences. Heterogeneity is likely to generate declining aggregate relative risk aversion. This leads to variability in expected asset returns, volatility, and autocorrelation. The stronger this variability is, the more heter...
متن کامل