Agents with Moral Sentiments in an Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma Exercise
نویسندگان
چکیده
We present the results of a simulation of the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma where some agents behave rationally and others have moral sentiments towards those from the same social group. They suggest that in societies where agents can possess such characteristics, to behave rationally, in the usual sense in Game Theory~ is not the best attitude for good performance in the long run, both individually and for the group.
منابع مشابه
Evolving Agents with Moral Sentiments in an Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma Exercise
We have been experimenting on simulations of a society of agents where some of them have “moral sentiments” towards the agents that belong to the same social group, using the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma as a metaphor for the social interactions. We were able to observe the well-understood phenomenon of short-sighted, self-interested agents performing well in the short-term but ruining their cha...
متن کاملMoral Sentiments in Multi-Agent Systems
We present a simulation of a society of agents where some of them have \moral sentiments" towards the agents that belong to the same social group, using the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma as a metaphor for the social interactions. Besides the well-understood phenomenon of shortsighted , self-interested agents performing well in the short-term but ruining their chances of such performance in the lo...
متن کاملTrust in an N-Player Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma
The iterated Prisoner's Dilemma (iPD) is a standard problem for the evolution of cooperation. Published work so far dealt mainly with the 2-player case, which is neither very realistic nor very relevant for applications , as societies, in a general sense, usually are made of more than two agents. We present novel results where cooperation co-evolves with trust in an N-player iPD. In doing so, t...
متن کاملSocio-Affective Agents as Models of Human Behaviour in the Networked Prisoner's Dilemma
Affect Control Theory (ACT) is a powerful and general sociological model of human affective interaction. ACT provides an empirically derived mathematical model of culturally shared sentiments as heuristic guides for human decision making. BayesACT, a variant on classical ACT, combines affective reasoning with cognitive (denotative or logical) reasoning as is traditionally found in AI. BayesACT ...
متن کامل