Behavioral Inconsistencies Do Not Imply Inconsistent Strategies
نویسندگان
چکیده
=1858769 Gigerenzer, G., and Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 62, 451–482. Gonzalez, C., and Dutt, V. (2011). Instance-based learning: integrating sampling and repeated decisions from experience. Psychol. Rev. 118, 523–551. Hertwig, R. (2011). The psychology and rationality of decisions from experience. Synthese. doi: 10.1007/
منابع مشابه
The need to explain.
How do reasoners deal with inconsistencies? James (1907) believed that the rational solution is to revise your beliefs and to do so in a minimal way. We propose an alternative: You explain the origins of an inconsistency, which has the side effect of a revision to your beliefs. This hypothesis predicts that individuals should spontaneously create explanations of inconsistencies rather than refu...
متن کاملIn Defense of the Rationality Assumption
It has become commonplace for economists to assert that human beings are not fully economically rational. Many psychologists and behavioral economists now maintain that economic agents do not reason very well, that these agents often do not know what is good for them and that they behave in odd, non-reasoning, inconsistent ways. Paradoxes and inconsistencies supposedly surface in economic behav...
متن کاملInconsistencies between Theory and Observation and the Limits of Chunk and Permeate
During the last two decades, the emergence of paraconsistent logics as well as the study of some particular episodes from the history of science have motivated the development of formal reasoning strategies that aim at explaining how it is sometimes possible to reason sensibly from inconsistencies without necessarily arriving to arbitrary conclusions. One of such strategies is Chunk and Permeat...
متن کاملInconsistency Pays ? : Time - Inconsistent Subjects and EU Violators Earn More
Experimental choice data from 881 subjects based on 40 time-tradeoff items and 32 risky choice items reveal that most subjects are time-inconsistent and most violate the axioms of expected utility theory. These inconsistencies cannot be explained by well-known theories of behavioral inconsistency, such as hyperbolic discounting and cumulative prospect theory. Aggregating expected payoffs and th...
متن کاملFunnelling the Consequence of Inconsistencies
Unresolved conflicts can introduce inconsistent and uncertain choices into a system description. Such inconsistencies imply nondeterminancy and nondeterminism is a bad thing; e.g. Leveson says that “nondeterminism is the enemy of reliability” [2]. Requirement engineers, on the other hand, argue that inconsistencies are a good thing [9]. To be human is to hold an opinion. To be an expert is to h...
متن کامل