The Mental Models Theory of Deductive Reasoning: Implications for Proof Instruction
نویسندگان
چکیده
There are currently increased efforts to make proof central to school mathematics throughout the grades. Yet, realizing this goal is not easy, as it requires that students master several abilities. In this article, we focus on one such ability, namely, the ability for deductive reasoning. We first offer a conceptualization of proof, which we use to delineate our focus on deductive reasoning. We then review Johnson-Laird’s mental models theory – a well-respected psychological theory of deductive reasoning – in order to enhance what is currently known in mathematics education research about deductive reasoning in the context of proof.
منابع مشابه
Developing and validating an instructional design model based on mental model theory
Abstract: This research has been done to develop and validate an instructional design model based on mental model theory. Based on mental model theory human being can do reasoning and problem solving through mental models. The main purpose of this model is to help pupils construct mental models, gain expertise and promote problem solving. In order to develop this model and response to research ...
متن کاملMental Models, Deductive Reasoning, and the Brain
This chapter considers the two main approaches to deductive thinking: theories based on formal rules of inference postulate that deduction is a syntactic process akin to a logical proof; the mental model theory postulates that it is a semantic process akin to the search for counterexamples. Experimental evidence bears out the predictions of the model theory: the more models needed for a deducti...
متن کاملAnatomy of deductive reasoning.
Much of cognitive research on deductive reasoning has been preoccupied with advocating for or against visuospatial (mental model theory) or linguistic/syntactic (mental logic theory) models of logical reasoning. Neuroimaging studies bear on this issue by pointing to both language-based and visuospatial systems being engaged during logical reasoning, and by raising additional issues not anticipa...
متن کاملPii: S0364-0213(01)00056-8
One of the most debated questions in psychology and cognitive science is the nature and the functioning of the mental processes involved in deductive reasoning. However, all existing theories refer to a specific deductive domain, like syllogistic, propositional or relational reasoning. Our goal is to unify the main types of deductive reasoning into a single set of basic procedures. In particula...
متن کاملModels, Rules, and Deductive Reasoning
We formulate a simple theory of deductive reasoning based on mental models. One prediction of the theory is experimentally tested and found to be incorrect. The bearing of our results on contemporary theories of mental models is discussed. We then consider a potential objection to current rule-theories of deduction. Such theories picture deductive reasoning as the successive application of infe...
متن کامل