Is Emperor Julian’s Contra Galilaeos a Plausible Critique of Christianity?
نویسنده
چکیده
In Contra Galilaeos, Julian makes the case that in the writings of Moses Yahweh is not the ‘Most High’ God, but simply one of many national gods (the biblical term is ‘angels’ or ‘sons of god/s’, לא ינב, םילא ינב, or ב םיהלאה ינ ) of the ancient Near Eastern world, who received Israel as an inheritance from the hand of the Most High. Christians claim the Jewish Yahweh as their God, and appeal to the Hebrew writings to identify the qualities of that God; but Julian claims that the Jewish writings clearly depict Yahweh as a subordinate tribal god, who was neither the Creator (demiurge), nor to be identified with the God of Abraham, nor to be equated with the Most High (Hypsistos), apportioning God of Deut. 32:8-9. Julian extrapolates from this stunning premise that there is therefore no compelling comparison to be advanced between Yahweh, as depicted in the Hebrew Scriptures, and the God proclaimed by the Christians. Julian’s argument will receive unexpected support from the 1929 archaeological findings of Ugarit, which have had a significant impact on helping to identify ancient Near Eastern gods alluded to in the documents of the Hebrew Bible. Indeed, Julian’s analyses of the texts of the Hebrew Bible are sustained by nothing less than the accumulated mythological weight of the entire ancient Near East. Since its incarnation in the last quarter of the nineteenth century as the dream-child of Heinrich Schliemann, archaeology has made significant contributions to Jewish and Christian studies. Although archaeological discoveries have consistently confirmed the richness of the historical grounding and absolute intellectual relevance of religious studies, findings have rarely been decisive enough to affirm clearly any one interpretative tradition over another. Until Ras Shamra. Jewish studies, Christian studies, and by extension Islamic studies, stand now on the cusp of a new reformation in which the challenge shall be to rethink the relationship between the Hebrew Scriptures and the various religious traditions (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam), which claim derivative authority based on those original scriptures; between (1) Yahweh, the clan or tribal god of the Jews; (2) the God later painstakingly proclaimed first by the nascent Christian Church, then articulated through the philosophical ratiocinations of the Christian schoolmen; and finally (3) Allah, the All Merciful All Compassionate Creator (i.e., all-
منابع مشابه
Panel: “Heresy, Inquisition, and the State”
Religious persecution of “heretics” by the Catholic Church that characterizes the middle ages had its roots in power struggles centuries prior. In the first centuries of Christianity, Christians fought amongst themselves for interpretive and doctrinal authority. Heterodoxy didn’t stand a chance in the Middle Ages; in Late Antiquity nothing was certain. Everything changed when, in 380, Emperor T...
متن کاملAlasdair MacIntyre as a Marxist and as a critic of Marxism
In his 1995 introduction to Marxism and Christianity, Alasdair MacIntyre claimed that Marxism ‘is the only secular post-enlightenment doctrine to have’ a metaphysical and moral scope comparable to that of Christianity. This was not meant as a mere academic point, for Marxism: An Interpretation (the title of the first, 1953, edition of Marxism and Christianity) was written as a contribution to w...
متن کاملThe Nietzschean Verification of the Missing God and Steps to a Completest Self
This paper aims to present Friedrich Nietzsche’s critique of Christianity as a Western example that reconfirms the necessity for man’s inner development up to the stage of the Completest Self (nafs-i safiyya). With the advent of Christianity and the resultant triumph of its “morality of slave” (1886, sec. 260), the “death of God” (1882) becomes the “fundamental event of Western history” and its...
متن کاملCelsus of Pergamum: Locating a Critic of Early Christianity
lēthēs Logos of Celsus, preserved in large part with Origen’s response in Contra Celsum, is the most signifi cant extant second-century literary attack on Christianity. Celsus attacked Christianity not only for philosophic reasons, but also because he was alarmed about social consequences of the spread of Christianity. His book was occasioned by Christians refusing to honor the cults of the Rom...
متن کاملJewish Anti-Christian Polemics in the Early Modern Period: Change or Continuity?
I The Jewish-Christian debate goes back to the origins of Christianity. Jews are portrayed in the New Testament as questioning both Jesus’ messianic status as well as the claim that he was resurrected from the dead. As adherers to a religion which emerged from Judaism, early Christians found it necessary to write polemical treatises attacking Judaism, probably more for purposes of self-definiti...
متن کامل