Formal Inferences
نویسنده
چکیده
ion is a gifted capability of human beings. Abstraction is a basic cognitive process of the brain at the meta cognitive layer according to the Layered Reference Model of the Brain (LRMB) (Wang, 2003a, 2007c; Wang, Liu, & Wang, 2003, 2006). Only by abstraction can important theorems and laws about the objects under study be elicited and discovered from a great variety of phenomena and empirical observations in an area of inquiry. Definition 2: Inferences are a formal cognitive process that reasons a possible causality from given premises based on known causal relations between a pair of cause and effect proven true by empirical arguments, theoretical inferences, or statistical regulations. Mathematical logic, such as propositional and predicate logic, provide a powerful means for logical reasoning and inference on truth and falsity (Hurley, 1997; Schoning, 1989; Sperschneider & Antoniou, 1991; Van Heije� noort, 1997). Definition 3. An argument is an assertion that yields () a proposition Q called the conclusion from a given finite set of propositions known as the premises P1, P2, ..., Pn, that is: BL (P1BL ∧ P2BL ∧ ... ∧ PnBL QBL)BL (1) where the argument and all propositions are in type Boolean (BL). Hence, BL = T called a valid argument, otherwise it is a fallacy, that is, BL = F. Equation 1 can also be denoted in the fol� lowing inference structure: 1 2 ... n Premises P P P Conclusion Q BL BL BL BL BL BL BL (2) Example 1 The following expressions are concrete argu� ments: a. A concrete deductive argument 1 2 Information processing is an intelligent behavior ( ). Computer is able to process information ( ). Computer is an itelligent machine ( ). 1 P P
منابع مشابه
Inference Algebra (IA): A Denotational Mathematics for Cognitive Computing and Machine Reasoning (II)
Inference as the basic mechanism of thought is one of the gifted abilities of human beings. It is recognized that a coherent theory and mathematical means are needed for dealing with formal causal inferences. This paper presents a novel denotational mathematical means for formal inferences known as Inference Algebra (IA). IA is structured as a set of algebraic operators on a set of formal causa...
متن کاملFormal Rules for Fuzzy Causal Analyses and Fuzzy Inferences
Causal inference is one of the central capabilities of the natural intelligence that plays a crucial role in thinking, perception, and problem solving. Fuzzy inferences are an extended form of formal inferences that provide a denotational mathematical means for rigorously dealing with degrees of matters, uncertainties, and vague semantics of linguistic variables, as well as for rational reasoni...
متن کاملTowards Modeling Natural Language Inferences with Part-Whole Relations using Formal Ontology and Lexical Semantics
In this paper, we present a framework of natural language semantics combined with formal ontology to deal with lexical and world knowledge. We build on a framework of Dependent Type Semantics (DTS), a framework of natural language semantics based on dependent type theory. We show how to handle natural language inferences with part-whole relations, in particular, bridging inferences and inferenc...
متن کاملSmall and Medium Enterprises Financing in Bangladesh: The Missing Middle
This paper aims to comprehend the intrinsic limitations of the market players in the financial system and how these create a situation of `missing middle` for small and medium industries (SME) financing in Bangladesh. A clear dualism prevails in the manufacturing industry of this country. While the SMEs maintains the biggest share in establishments and employment creation, large enterprises (LE...
متن کاملThe Cognitive Processes of Formal Inferences
Theoretical research is predominately an inductive process, while applied research is mainly a deductive process. Both inference processes are based on the cognitive process and means of abstraction. This chapter describes the cognitive processes of formal inferences such as deduction, induction, abduction, and analogy. Conventional propositional arguments adopt static causal inference. This ch...
متن کاملSimulating Human Inferences in the Light of New Information: A Formal Analysis
Human answer patterns in psychological reasoning experiments systematically deviate from predictions of classical logic. When interactions between any artificial reasoning system and humans are necessary this difference can be useful in some cases and lead to problems in other cases. Hence, other approaches than classical logic might be better suited to capture human inference processes. Evalua...
متن کامل