Partially Grounded Planning as Quantified Boolean Formula
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper describes a technique for translating bounded propositional reachability problems, such as Planning, into Quantified Boolean Formulae (QBF). The key feature of this translation is that the problem, and the resultant encoding is only partially grounded. The technique is applicable to other SAT or QBF encodings as an additional improvement, potentially reducing the size of the resulting formula by an exponential amount. We present experimental results showing that the approach applied to a simple SAT translation greatly improves the time taken to encode and solve problems in which there are many objects of a single type, even solving some problems that cannot be reasonably encoded as SAT.
منابع مشابه
An Effective QBF Solver for Planning Problems
A large number of applications can be represented by quantified Boolean formulas (QBF). Although evaluating QBF is NP-hard and thus very difficult, there has been significant progress in the development of QBF solvers. These solvers require the quantified Boolean formula to be in a standard format. We have encountered a large class of problems whose representation as QBF is not in that standard...
متن کاملPlanning as SAT- and QBF-Based reasoning
Planning is a traditional research area in AI. The last decade has witnessed a large body of work in the development of languages and algorithms for planning, up to the point where complex, realistic problems can be modeled and solved in seconds. At the same time, thanks to the generality of the problem formulation, several applicative problems can be recasted into planning. This is also true i...
متن کاملA Symbolic Search Based Approach for Quantified Boolean Formulas
Solving Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBF) has become an important and attractive research area, since several problem classes might be formulated efficiently as QBF instances (e.g. planning, non monotonic reasoning, twoplayer games, model checking, etc). Many QBF solvers has been proposed, most of them perform decision tree search using the DPLL-like techniques. To set free the variable orderin...
متن کاملA General QBF-based Formalization of abstract Argumentation Theory
We introduce a unified logical approach, based on signed theories and Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBFs), that can serve as a basis for representing and reasoning with various argumentation-based decision problems. By this, we are able to represent, in a uniform and simple way, a wide range of extension-based semantics for argumentation theory, including complete, grounded, preferred, semistabl...
متن کاملA QBF-based formalization of abstract argumentation semantics
We introduce a unified logical theory, based on signed theories and Quantified Boolean Formulas (QBFs) that can serve as the basis for representing and computing various argumentationbased decision problems. It is shown that within our framework we are able to model, in a simple and modular way, a wide range of semantics for abstract argumentation theory. This includes complete, grounded, prefe...
متن کامل