Independent Opinions? On the Causal Founda- tions of Belief Formation and Jury Theorems

نویسنده

  • Franz Dietrich
چکیده

It is often claimed that opinions are more likely to be correct if they are held independently by many individuals. But what does it mean to hold independent opinions? To clarify this condition, we distinguish four notions of probabilistic opinion independence. Which notion applies depends on environmental factors such as commonly perceived evidence. More formally, it depends on the causal network that determines how people interact and form their opinions. In a general theorem, we identify conditions on this network that guarantee the four notions of opinion independence. Our results have implications for ‘wisdom of crowds’ arguments, as we illustrate with old and new jury theorems.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Economics and Economy in the Theory of Belief Revision

Plato laboured hard to characterize the di erence between genuine knowledge and mere belief He may be read as having claimed the knowledge is justi ed true belief Meno e a Theaetetus c d This account became the standard analysis of knowledge for more than two millennia Since knowledge entails belief on the standard account any attempt to fathom out the founda tions of knowledge must include an ...

متن کامل

The Effect of the Rule of Rational Beauty and Ugliness on the Moral Opinions of Khajeh Nasir al-Din Tusi

The present study seeks to examine the effect of the theological rule of “rational beauty and ugliness” on “moral opinions” in the field of philosophical ethics by exploring the two books “Purification of Belief” and “Nasirean Ethics” written by the famous scientist, Khajeh Nasir al-Din Tusi. This research has been done by content analysis method and its findings show that on the one hand, the ...

متن کامل

Distributed Belief Revision as Applied Within a Descriptive Model of Jury Deliberations

Belief revision is a well-research topic within AI. We argue that the new model of distributed belief revision as discussed here is suitable for general modelling of judicial decision making, along with extant approach as known from jury research. The new approach to belief revision is of general interest, whenever attitudes to information are to be simulated within a multi-agent environment wi...

متن کامل

A NOTE ON INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY MAPPINGS

In this paper, the concept of intuitionistic fuzzy mapping as a generalization of fuzzy mapping is presented, and its' relationship with intuitionistic fuzzy relations is derived. Moreover, some basicoperations of intuitionistic fuzzy mappings are defined, hence we can conclude that all of intuitionistic fuzzy mappings constitute a soft algebrawith respect to these operations. Afterwards, the A...

متن کامل

Experimental research on jury decision-making.

Because trial juries deliberate in secrecy, legal debates about jury functioning have relied heavily on anecdote and speculation. In recent years, investigators have begun to challenge many common assumptions about jury behavior. An important tool in this effort has been the mock jury experiment, in which research participants are randomly assigned to alternative trial conditions and asked to r...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013