Empirical testing of an algorithm for defining somatization in children.

INTRODUCTION A previous article proposed an algorithm for defining somatization in children by classifying them into three categories: well, medically ill, and somatizer; the authors suggested further empirical validation of the algorithm (Postilnik et al., 2006). We use the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) to provide this empirical validation. METHOD Parents of children seen in pediatric clinics completed the CBCL (n=126). The physicians of these children completed specially-designed questionnaires. The sample comprised of 62 boys and 64 girls (age range 2 to 15 years). Classification categories included: well (n=53), medically ill (n=55), and somatizer (n=18). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical comparisons. Discriminant function analysis was conducted with the CBCL subscales. RESULTS There were significant differences between the classification categories for the somatic complaints (p=<0.001), social problems (p=0.004), thought problems (p=0.01), attention problems (0.006), and internalizing (p=0.003) subscales and also total (p=0.001), and total-t (p=0.001) scales of the CBCL. Discriminant function analysis showed that 78% of somatizers and 66% of well were accurately classified, while only 35% of medically ill were accurately classified. CONCLUSION The somatization classification algorithm proposed by Postilnik et al. (2006) shows promise for classification of children and adolescents with somatic symptoms.