Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for failed imperforate anus surgery: lessons learned from secondary repairs.

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate secondary operations using a posterior sagittal approach in patients with fecal incontinence and impaction after primary repair of anorectal malformations. METHODS Twenty patients (14 boys, 6 girls) who had previous failed surgery for imperforate anus underwent secondary operations. The indications for surgery included fecal incontinence (n = 16) and fecal impaction (n = 4). Patients ranged in age from 2 to 30 years (mean, 11 years), with 4 over the age of 20 years. The primary procedures included abdominosacroperineal (n = 7), sacroperineal (n = 10), and perineal (n = 3) pull-throughs. At surgery, none of the patients underwent a diverting colostomy. The rectum was mobilized from the surrounding structures through a posterior sagittal approach. The surgical findings included anteriorly displaced anus (n = 17), laterally displaced anus (n = 3), mesenteric fat surrounding the rectum (n = 4), mega-rectosigmoid (n = 2), and others (n = 3). The rectum underwent reconstruction, which involved relocation of the rectum and anus to surround them with the muscle complex. RESULTS Patients underwent follow-up for periods ranging from 8 months to 6 years after surgery (mean, 3 years). To evaluate the functional results, fecal continence scores (Templeton and Ditesheim) were calculated for incontinent patients. Of the 16 incontinent patients, 12 achieved continence and 4 some improvement. Of the 4 patients with fecal impaction, 2 achieved daily voluntary bowel movement, whereas the other 2 have mild constipation and need occasional enemas. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that (1) a secondary operation through a posterior sagittal approach can restore fecal continence and is efficacious even in adolescents and adults and (2) a posterior sagittal procedure can be safely performed without a diverting colostomy.